I agree specific DVM kinds is kind of quirky. I think the issue is that the observed usage is different from how the spec was conceived.
Spec: specify a kind and see which npub replies
Actual use: tag a specific npub
If someone tags and npub that is set up to give a certain response, then the kind number seems redundant.
But IMO this kind of thing is always the issue with defining a new spec, including if you were to define a new one. IMO better to evolve what is already in use.
Rod
npub1r0…rfsft
2025-03-24 02:06:58 UTC
in reply to nevent1q…07kh
Author Public Key
npub1r0d8u8mnj6769500nypnm28a9hpk9qg8jr0ehe30tygr3wuhcnvs4rfsftPublished at
2025-03-24 02:06:58 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "b2ff4f59316a56c49537f3a8b0cfc3033cf299a321edf8199cb6d79577df1c39",
"pubkey": "1bda7e1f7396bda2d1ef99033da8fd2dc362810790df9be62f591038bb97c4d9",
"created_at": 1742782018,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"b92b108a6f84cf30a076bef43f3f29c7b692a17df8fba09d156affd602129def",
"",
"root"
],
[
"e",
"e1fdc13650571c329820c33100e548b07d810be1deb166f44d922c45c7cdac6f"
],
[
"e",
"337f347241755837f1d0926fd1d794f1eb0a4b2e5be1b996e1e08e92bb3fd9c3",
"",
"reply"
],
[
"p",
"460c25e682fda7832b52d1f22d3d22b3176d972f60dcdc3212ed8c92ef85065c"
],
[
"p",
"ab66431b1dfbaeb805a6bd24365c2046c7a2268de643bd0690a494ca042b705c"
],
[
"p",
"da0cc82154bdf4ce8bf417eaa2d2fa99aa65c96c77867d6656fccdbf8e781b18"
]
],
"content": "I agree specific DVM kinds is kind of quirky. I think the issue is that the observed usage is different from how the spec was conceived. \n\nSpec: specify a kind and see which npub replies\n\nActual use: tag a specific npub \n\nIf someone tags and npub that is set up to give a certain response, then the kind number seems redundant.\n\nBut IMO this kind of thing is always the issue with defining a new spec, including if you were to define a new one. IMO better to evolve what is already in use.",
"sig": "841fbd80e56f269527a8a4142f75d5229d3e4c9741cafc5d95eb597cc8f54b80ca80aef9530f61fa153db784a3fec7af1c84191a33d7fc7e82c87b36197b9838"
}