📇⬇️ policy:
signed
https://www.youtube.com/live/bsJN8a_9Avk?si=5B52mP9ncf7m6ICM
📇⬇️ policy:
habeus corpus already covers the conversation attempting to be interwoven into "private property laws". the rhetorical effort to erode the boundary between human and property is a quiet creep pumped by fintech - in order to validate token markets and human sale over the counter: slave trade. habeus corpus answers the human sovereignty conversation in the property rights shadow docket. you don't need to litigate it again - which begs the question what the agenda really is regarding this case; or is it genuine incompetence.
https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/rfc-dlc/ccrf-ccdl/check/art10c.html
canada needs to return to the awareness of plain meaning and common law in order to avoid entrapping themselves in the mess they are in regarding bc -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_meaning_rule?wprov=sfti1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Common_law?wprov=sfti1#Comparison_with_statutory_law
📇⬇️ policy:
the simplest explanation for the issue in bc is the specific definition of private and property matter acutely in terms of the context in which they are meant (for example public versus private in terms of socialist systems make a massive difference than in a capitalist market); and to what extent are we applying property to the shadow docket beyond the concept of physical land, and to human capital heads per acre, mining rights, and natural resources.
how owners take title is the most effective way to untangle land property disputes. and if no title exists, the older land claims and deeds apply. paper trails must be honored; i understand that does not always honor land theft from indigenous groups which is why this case was a prime target for agenda-based exploitation. the positive aspect of canadian history is how well-documented it is.
reminder corporate law for llcs in the us regarding tax havens is DIFFERENT from canadian law and american corporate entities brokering their fintech dockets through canadian courts are causing problems.
nevent1q…ksht
not so obscure now, is it. 😂🤣😎🚬💋
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DADVSI?wprov=sfti1
carney: you're ridiculous and you know you're being hyperbolic about protecting private property "at all costs". canadian expropriation is one of the most liberal in the g20. and it could be argued the double standard of telling lawyers not to defend property rights and also standing in the house and saying you support private property is of particular benefit to the fintech markets you represent - which includes the misappropriated allocation of land under the confused reading to indigenous groups.... and then use expropriation to seize it for development, and receive even less push back because they are underrepresented communities. i doubt seriously your private donors care about anything other than eventual seizure -
https://laws.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/E-21/page-1.html#h-211935
https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2023/spac-pspc/P4-116-2023-eng.pdf
✔️ fine
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louise_Arbour
📇⬇️ policy:
moving sexual misconduct to civilian courts is absolutely an appropriate choice, because it is too easy for closed culture to silence cases internally; especially assault against women. the progression to make a bridge between military and civilian courts for a more fluid narrative regarding habeus corpus would benefit the canadian justice system because traditionally, much institutional memory is locked behind military censorship. also - this is an excellent bonus for the progress for ending violence against indigenous and abled communities because it streamlines databases and disallows military (and police?) service as a hiding place for predatory behavior.
https://openparliament.ca/bills/45-1/C-11/
📇⬇️ policy:
let's hear from the whole class - 🤓☀️.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Provinces_and_territories_of_Canada?wprov=sfti1
note: liberals were much more alert - thank you.
also, conservative screeching over liberal women is inappropriate and the house needs to maintain decorum for all members while speaking.