Event JSON
{
"id": "39ba7eb47a438ede34a068d2da45a090b770ab312f5e1c88a00945d5121be6a5",
"pubkey": "2e06c0a8fc3d2d6f5307d5a6f3d369dcf6bdfe743449be493af38a345d1a2316",
"created_at": 1763147832,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"t",
"softwaredistribution"
],
[
"t",
"flatpak"
],
[
"t",
"appimage"
],
[
"t",
"packagemanager"
],
[
"t",
"linux"
],
[
"t",
"foss"
],
[
"imeta",
"url https://cdn.fosstodon.org/media_attachments/files/115/549/655/779/440/131/original/45532434cd31d7be.png",
"m image/png"
],
[
"t",
"snap"
],
[
"t",
"opensource"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://fosstodon.org/@linuxmagazine/115549656361537201",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://fosstodon.org/users/linuxmagazine/statuses/115549656361537201",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://fosstodon.org/users/linuxmagazine/statuses/115549656361537201",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Modern-day package systems solve some problems posed by classic formats like DEB and RPM. Andrea Ciarrocchi looks at Flatpak, AppImage, and Snap and describes how they differ\nhttps://www.linux-magazine.com/Issues/2025/298/Universal-Package-Formats?utm_source=mlm\n#PackageManager #Flatpak #AppImage #Snap #Linux #OpenSource #SoftwareDistribution #FOSS\nhttps://cdn.fosstodon.org/media_attachments/files/115/549/655/779/440/131/original/45532434cd31d7be.png\n",
"sig": "e003c00e295b5f08860d46d48397c5ed745527f19801877566ac7e7ea7f61a7e4232ed5f7015f61ac73dcb272ed7a6c3950272b88f254c94eaedd39194cb6326"
}