Pierre Bourdon on Nostr: Hot take, don't @ me: AGPL should never have been an OSI approved license. The ...
Hot take, don't @ me: AGPL should never have been an OSI approved license.
The license is basically a compliance trap, and I would posit that > 99% of modified AGPL software violates the license.
This leads to a world where license enforcement is entirely up to arbitrary decisions by the copyright owner. Any contributor to an AGPL software package (without CLA) can go and mass-send C&Ds and/or request $$$, kind of like the Creative Commons copyright trolls have been doing for CC-BY violations.
Published at
2024-08-16 02:16:08 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "3fc977494d4cc2d503666067f7922b5b7bbc3a783fac71625b0d0cb817f92905",
"pubkey": "3f6fc37b151fba0be3e6e115ef1f7a8f6dd493f9aa8949fad599f65bcc792cce",
"created_at": 1723774568,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.delroth.net/@delroth/112969290091063670",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.delroth.net/users/delroth/statuses/112969290091063670",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://mastodon.delroth.net/users/delroth/statuses/112969290091063670",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Hot take, don't @ me: AGPL should never have been an OSI approved license.\n\nThe license is basically a compliance trap, and I would posit that \u003e 99% of modified AGPL software violates the license.\n\nThis leads to a world where license enforcement is entirely up to arbitrary decisions by the copyright owner. Any contributor to an AGPL software package (without CLA) can go and mass-send C\u0026Ds and/or request $$$, kind of like the Creative Commons copyright trolls have been doing for CC-BY violations.",
"sig": "7443fd070eb2b2a934f1f11c332e9dd131bbbaaa01d284179ad10b28a17f9e75fad99440f4622093241e885818d9ea25e281d181cf5702310f789137fac27453"
}