f0xr on Nostr: What if it's not who can vote, but the concept of voting itself that's flawed? What ...

What if it's not who can vote, but the concept of voting itself that's flawed? What if there are things that aren't appropriately deciding by vote, period?

If 2 guys jump you in a dark alley and demand your wallet, are you okay with handing it over if the 3 of you vote on it?

If a group of people sat around a table, would you be okay with putting your net worth on the table and deciding how it gets used by popular vote of those sitting there? Would it matter who was at the table? Or how many people were at the table?

When you reject moral absolutes and try to base "morality" on popular vote, you end up where the West is today.

I reject the concept of any group of people voting as a legitimate way to allocate my private property or establish a moral pattern of behavior for my life.