my argument is that the "rape" and "abuse" charges are not rooted in reality.
There is no evidence of actual "rape", aside from statuatory rape which isn't rape. And even in those cases, it was because the "minors" in question lied about their ages!
You're essentially saying "I'm pro-sex work and lowering the AoC, but against people paying people for sex and "minors" engaging in sex-work because it involves "rape" and "abuse"".
How can you not see this?
You are suffering cognitive dissonance.
