It comes down to a narrow definition versus a broader one. If capitalism is defined in its historical context (meaning accurately), then yes, one could say bitcoin an antithetical to that; specifically the centralizing force of coporate and state power (Marx's primary critique, as I understand it).
Defining capitalism as a free market system of private property rights will yield a different conclusion to the topic, but as Jeff Booth (nprofile…7p82) frequently points out, this has never existed.
It's easy to get caught up in the he-said/she-said of economic history, but the reality of peer to peer cash on a global free market is fundamentally different than anything humanity has experienced thus far.
quotingI always knew a person could shoehorn bitcoin into whatever ideology they want, but to see it happen in the wild is awe inspiring.
nevent1q…ny7c
nevent1q…3duj