Zsubmariner on Nostr: Thanks. I probably won't have time to dig into the mailing list though. And I still ...

Thanks. I probably won't have time to dig into the mailing list though. And I still don't get the justification for it being temporary. I would think that if we need a subsequent change, do a subsequent change.

Or maybe I do get it...

Is it because by letting it expire we could make adjustments as a subsequent soft fork, rather than risking a hard fork, since the starting position would be current constraints and not 110 constraints?