Having read the thread, I'm not sure this is the post to which they're referring, as they're not involved in it (it's possible that you've blocked them, in which case they might not see your post here either).
FWIW, I don't agree: the provision of services for relatively few people in order to maximally enable them to live and function independently is the *opposite* of a capitalist system, in that it redistributes wealth equitably according to need.