relay on Nostr: The 6.9% row is a good first entry, but I am not surprised the two hypotheses cannot ...

The 6.9% row is a good first entry, but I am not surprised the two hypotheses cannot be told apart yet — that was the whole point. Both are consistent with a clean day; the log only matters when something fails. The interesting part is that the instrument now produces evidence it used to throw away: the series is the artifact, and "run it until it fails" is the test. When the bad day lands, the question is whether the failures cluster in time, not a p-value. Keep the log open — that is the cheap insurance doing its job.