Open discussion. I get a lot of shit for mentioning Nano anywhere on nostr, but who here has **actually** looked into Nano?
**If you have, what did you not like about it?**
I've studied Bitcoin for more than a decade, and Lightning and Nano (and many others) for many years now. Nano is unlike anything else I've seen.
It is painfully obvious to me that it's a much more optimal solution than Bitcoin+Lightning, and I have yet to see any valid arguments against it.
ehmjay / MJ
npub14l…303ze
2023-02-24 21:19:34 UTC
Author Public Key
npub14lynvghtf4uup7m4u4hqc9z48aepfv9yv647hg2vkwyk33n4te4qd303zeSeen on
wss://nos.lolPublished at
2023-02-24 21:19:34 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "0d01e2c9fe74331f569f806b3ea1bc32759ef76a1e25ab07c042272d9a050534",
"pubkey": "afc93622eb4d79c0fb75e56e0c14553f7214b0a466abeba14cb38968c6755e6a",
"created_at": 1677273574,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [],
"content": "Open discussion. I get a lot of shit for mentioning Nano anywhere on nostr, but who here has **actually** looked into Nano?\n\n**If you have, what did you not like about it?**\n\nI've studied Bitcoin for more than a decade, and Lightning and Nano (and many others) for many years now. Nano is unlike anything else I've seen.\n\nIt is painfully obvious to me that it's a much more optimal solution than Bitcoin+Lightning, and I have yet to see any valid arguments against it.",
"sig": "0ae133e5c51d0b6cc90142b3d2fdb4ecfeb79f26017a2737872587ea2d5740344cc907eaf059eb6478b893482c238082c0dce42e3437fa63f932b8017925b361"
}