You've likely already read our previous thread where we directly addressed these inaccurate claims. Here's the relevant part of the thread:
https://grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/116354014750484314
We're repeatedly published content addressing people inaccurately claiming GrapheneOS is a security project rather than a privacy project. He has read multiple of these threads and knows what we've said. He's saying what he did in the interview despite that. This isn't about getting any technical details wrong.
nostr:note1ws9dxuuyl5dpw0seg3amju8lht758zsl5zuqlfu8jwtgsq8vypmqrp4x6l