Dubbub :swastika_spin: ☦️ on Nostr: It's difficult to ask people to do terrorism, because it puts everything on the line, ...

It's difficult to ask people to do terrorism, because it puts everything on the line, the benefit is uncertain, the fallout can be difficult to predict. You don't want to shoot up a mosque, synagogue, board meeting, leftoid party, etc. and then sit in prison thinking you should've shot up the other. Breivik, Tarrant, Bowers, did the right thing at the right time and are celebrated, there's a dozen others who bungled it and you don't even know their names. Terrorism is high-risk, high-reward.

Sabotagism is low-risk, medium-reward. If you do it right the chances of getting caught are virtually zero. UK Blade Runners have proven that, uninstalling literal security cameras. It requires even less political consensus than terrorism (you just need to be anti-system). Sabotagism is the ideal way of fighting back, the only hurdle is most people lack the technical know-how and those with the technical know-how lack the conviction, and we can fix both of these.

Remember: once the system collapses you can kill shitskins/CEOs at will and there will be no police to catch you.