Chris Martin on Nostr: in my mind if you're trying to advocate for "simple haskell" you should therefore ...

in my mind if you're trying to advocate for "simple haskell" you should therefore should avoid making such abstruse recommendations as "avoid GADTs" and recommend that people simply define whatever datatypes best model their application without worrying about whether that datatype would be permissible in Haskell2010, an irrelevant question that requires a lot of historical trivia to answer