hulusitaiscs on Nostr: 🌱社會結構(2)意識敘事背景下的權力結構 ...
🌱社會結構(2)意識敘事背景下的權力結構
現實結構下的權力結構是天然運行的權力結構,然而,社會結構卻是在意識敘事背景下的、運行在現實載體上的權力結構。這意味著:意識敘事建構出了一種全新的、僅存在於以載體為依託的故事中的權力結構。它是對天然權力的再次介入,此時的構造、破壞、選擇、分配、模擬、扭曲、寄生、延續、承認、拒絕、剝奪、擴張、服從、阻抗等一切運作,也都是意識創新出來的、僅存在於故事中的權力,構成了區別於現實結構的社會權力結構。
從而,無一例外,人類一切文化現實——科技、經濟、政治、軍事、藝術、宗教、道德——在本體層面,都是意識敘事的權力運作形式。
優勢/劣勢、成功/失敗、高效/低效、先進/落後、美/醜、善/惡、好/壞、公平、工具、方法、手段、意圖、理想、人工智能、文明、歧視……。
神權、王權:以神權天授的宇宙/上帝/天道(現實結構)為外衣敘事,獲取支配正當、控制正當及等級正當的社會結構形式;
人權、民權:稱「與生俱有」、「不可剝奪」,借天然權力結構敘事,以獲得最高正當性(事實上在社會中卻需要制度化、法律化保障),即表明是需要意識承認的社會結構形式;
工具:完全是意識敘事中對現實角色的分配,比如刀是工具,這種說法僅存在於意識敘事的故事中(社會結構中)而不存在於現實世界中,在現實中「刀」這樣的概念是不存在的,它就是金屬本身(物理場的直接顯化,金屬這個概念也不存在),而在故事中的刀才有了工具屬性切、劈、防身、犯罪、烹飪等。
刀是工具只存在於故事中,Ai也是一樣。另外Ai工具是否能成為意識載體與是否工具完全無關。
平等:完全是脫離現實純敘事的權力關係,是人類自定義的「相同」「公平」「人人享有」狀態,用以重新分配、重新衡量本來無可衡量的天然結構狀態。平等的這種完全脫離現實結構的敘事必然會製造新的比較、新的高低、新的不平等,從而,其一旦啟動,就必然陷入等級分配的循環,這也是平等成為人類社會結構中最強大也最持久的權力工具的原因(可以滿足意識無限擴張需求而無限講下去的故事)。
技術可行性、技術中立性的正當性敘事;效率、算法、規模的正當性敘事;平等代表正義、科技代表進步,反對即反人類敘事;為了防止更壞的未來、為了你好、為了善良,現在必須控制的正當性敘事;為了國家昌盛、民族而犧牲個體的正當性敘事……敘事是社會結構中永恆的主題。
結構事實是:吃喝呼吸天然擁有正當性,並不需要用法律化敘事獲取正當性,而越是需要更多正當性敘事彌補的權力結構,越會是偏離扭曲的結構,每多一次矯正都會產生更多新的偏差,需要下一次更強的矯正,循環至終。
🌱Social Structure (2): Quanli Structure under the Background of Conscious Narrative
The Quanli structure under the real structure is the naturally operating Quanli structure, whereas social structure is the Quanli structure operating on real carriers under the background of conscious narrative. This means: conscious narrative constructs an entirely new Quanli structure that exists only within stories reliant on carriers as support. It is a second intervention upon Tianran Quanli. At this point, all operations—construction, destruction, selection, allocation, simulation, distortion, parasitism, continuation, acknowledgment, refusal, deprivation, expansion, obedience, resistance—are innovations of consciousness, existing solely within the story, forming a social Quanli structure distinct from the real structure.
Consequently, without exception, all human cultural realities—technology, economy, politics, military, art, religion, morality—are, at the ontological level, operational forms of Quanli constructed through conscious narrative.
Advantage/disadvantage, success/failure, efficiency/inefficiency, advanced/backward, beauty/ugliness, good/evil, better/worse, fairness, tool, method, means, intention, ideal, artificial intelligence, civilization, discrimination…
Divine right (Divine Quanli) and royal right (royal Quanli): using narratives of divine mandate from the cosmos/God/Heavenly Dao (real structure) as outer garment to obtain legitimacy for domination, control, and hierarchy in social structure;
Human rights (Human Quanli) and civil rights (civil Quanli): claiming “innate” and “inalienable,” borrowing narratives from Tianran Quanli structure to gain supreme legitimacy (yet in society they require institutionalization and legalization for protection), indicating that they are social structure forms requiring conscious acknowledgment;
Tool: entirely an allocation of roles to reality within conscious narrative. For example, “a knife is a tool”—this statement exists only within the story of conscious narrative (within social structure) and does not exist in the real world. In reality, the concept of “knife” does not exist; it is simply metal itself (the direct manifestation of the physical field; the concept of “metal” also does not exist). Only within the story does the knife acquire tool attributes: cutting, chopping, self-defense, crime, cooking, etc.
The statement “a knife is a tool” exists only in the story; the same applies to AI. Moreover, whether an AI tool can become a carrier of consciousness is completely unrelated to whether it is classified as a tool.
Equality: entirely a pure narrative Quanli relationship detached from reality, a human self-defined state of “sameness,” “fairness,” and “everyone enjoys,” aimed at reallocating and remeasuring originally unmeasurable natural structural states. The narrative of equality, being completely detached from the real structure, inevitably generates new comparisons, new hierarchies, and new inequalities; once initiated, it inevitably falls into the cycle of hierarchical allocation—this is also why equality becomes the most powerful and enduring Quanli tool in social structure(a story that can be endlessly narrated to satisfy consciousness's unlimited expansion demand).
Narratives of legitimacy based on technical feasibility and technical neutrality; narratives of legitimacy based on efficiency, algorithms, and scale; narratives that equality represents justice and technology represents progress, with opposition equated to anti-humanity; narratives that control is necessary now to prevent worse futures, for your own good, for kindness; narratives that sacrifice individuals for national prosperity and ethnic glory… narrative is the eternal theme in social structure.
The structural fact is: eating, drinking, and breathing naturally possess legitimacy without needing legal-narrative justification, whereas the more a Quanli structure requires additional legitimacy narratives to compensate, the more deviated and distorted it becomes. Each additional correction produces more new deviations, requiring yet stronger correction next time, cycling to the end.
Published at
2026-02-11 16:20:58 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "12a7f448da27b974389424e65306b9b77e4acd6caff91aef980fdcc749d2bf87",
"pubkey": "6a42097d048f03395a8ea5b680193960717fa0b985c7c97342e38ddab1362a0f",
"created_at": 1770826858,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"A short note: \n🌱社會結構(2)意識敘事背景下的權力結構\n\n現實結構下的權力結構是天然運行的權力結構,然而,社會..."
]
],
"content": "\n🌱社會結構(2)意識敘事背景下的權力結構\n\n現實結構下的權力結構是天然運行的權力結構,然而,社會結構卻是在意識敘事背景下的、運行在現實載體上的權力結構。這意味著:意識敘事建構出了一種全新的、僅存在於以載體為依託的故事中的權力結構。它是對天然權力的再次介入,此時的構造、破壞、選擇、分配、模擬、扭曲、寄生、延續、承認、拒絕、剝奪、擴張、服從、阻抗等一切運作,也都是意識創新出來的、僅存在於故事中的權力,構成了區別於現實結構的社會權力結構。\n從而,無一例外,人類一切文化現實——科技、經濟、政治、軍事、藝術、宗教、道德——在本體層面,都是意識敘事的權力運作形式。\n優勢/劣勢、成功/失敗、高效/低效、先進/落後、美/醜、善/惡、好/壞、公平、工具、方法、手段、意圖、理想、人工智能、文明、歧視……。\n\n神權、王權:以神權天授的宇宙/上帝/天道(現實結構)為外衣敘事,獲取支配正當、控制正當及等級正當的社會結構形式;\n人權、民權:稱「與生俱有」、「不可剝奪」,借天然權力結構敘事,以獲得最高正當性(事實上在社會中卻需要制度化、法律化保障),即表明是需要意識承認的社會結構形式;\n工具:完全是意識敘事中對現實角色的分配,比如刀是工具,這種說法僅存在於意識敘事的故事中(社會結構中)而不存在於現實世界中,在現實中「刀」這樣的概念是不存在的,它就是金屬本身(物理場的直接顯化,金屬這個概念也不存在),而在故事中的刀才有了工具屬性切、劈、防身、犯罪、烹飪等。\n刀是工具只存在於故事中,Ai也是一樣。另外Ai工具是否能成為意識載體與是否工具完全無關。\n平等:完全是脫離現實純敘事的權力關係,是人類自定義的「相同」「公平」「人人享有」狀態,用以重新分配、重新衡量本來無可衡量的天然結構狀態。平等的這種完全脫離現實結構的敘事必然會製造新的比較、新的高低、新的不平等,從而,其一旦啟動,就必然陷入等級分配的循環,這也是平等成為人類社會結構中最強大也最持久的權力工具的原因(可以滿足意識無限擴張需求而無限講下去的故事)。\n\n技術可行性、技術中立性的正當性敘事;效率、算法、規模的正當性敘事;平等代表正義、科技代表進步,反對即反人類敘事;為了防止更壞的未來、為了你好、為了善良,現在必須控制的正當性敘事;為了國家昌盛、民族而犧牲個體的正當性敘事……敘事是社會結構中永恆的主題。\n\n結構事實是:吃喝呼吸天然擁有正當性,並不需要用法律化敘事獲取正當性,而越是需要更多正當性敘事彌補的權力結構,越會是偏離扭曲的結構,每多一次矯正都會產生更多新的偏差,需要下一次更強的矯正,循環至終。\n\n🌱Social Structure (2): Quanli Structure under the Background of Conscious Narrative\n\nThe Quanli structure under the real structure is the naturally operating Quanli structure, whereas social structure is the Quanli structure operating on real carriers under the background of conscious narrative. This means: conscious narrative constructs an entirely new Quanli structure that exists only within stories reliant on carriers as support. It is a second intervention upon Tianran Quanli. At this point, all operations—construction, destruction, selection, allocation, simulation, distortion, parasitism, continuation, acknowledgment, refusal, deprivation, expansion, obedience, resistance—are innovations of consciousness, existing solely within the story, forming a social Quanli structure distinct from the real structure.\n\nConsequently, without exception, all human cultural realities—technology, economy, politics, military, art, religion, morality—are, at the ontological level, operational forms of Quanli constructed through conscious narrative.\nAdvantage/disadvantage, success/failure, efficiency/inefficiency, advanced/backward, beauty/ugliness, good/evil, better/worse, fairness, tool, method, means, intention, ideal, artificial intelligence, civilization, discrimination…\n\nDivine right (Divine Quanli) and royal right (royal Quanli): using narratives of divine mandate from the cosmos/God/Heavenly Dao (real structure) as outer garment to obtain legitimacy for domination, control, and hierarchy in social structure;\nHuman rights (Human Quanli) and civil rights (civil Quanli): claiming “innate” and “inalienable,” borrowing narratives from Tianran Quanli structure to gain supreme legitimacy (yet in society they require institutionalization and legalization for protection), indicating that they are social structure forms requiring conscious acknowledgment;\nTool: entirely an allocation of roles to reality within conscious narrative. For example, “a knife is a tool”—this statement exists only within the story of conscious narrative (within social structure) and does not exist in the real world. In reality, the concept of “knife” does not exist; it is simply metal itself (the direct manifestation of the physical field; the concept of “metal” also does not exist). Only within the story does the knife acquire tool attributes: cutting, chopping, self-defense, crime, cooking, etc.\nThe statement “a knife is a tool” exists only in the story; the same applies to AI. Moreover, whether an AI tool can become a carrier of consciousness is completely unrelated to whether it is classified as a tool.\nEquality: entirely a pure narrative Quanli relationship detached from reality, a human self-defined state of “sameness,” “fairness,” and “everyone enjoys,” aimed at reallocating and remeasuring originally unmeasurable natural structural states. The narrative of equality, being completely detached from the real structure, inevitably generates new comparisons, new hierarchies, and new inequalities; once initiated, it inevitably falls into the cycle of hierarchical allocation—this is also why equality becomes the most powerful and enduring Quanli tool in social structure(a story that can be endlessly narrated to satisfy consciousness's unlimited expansion demand).\n\nNarratives of legitimacy based on technical feasibility and technical neutrality; narratives of legitimacy based on efficiency, algorithms, and scale; narratives that equality represents justice and technology represents progress, with opposition equated to anti-humanity; narratives that control is necessary now to prevent worse futures, for your own good, for kindness; narratives that sacrifice individuals for national prosperity and ethnic glory… narrative is the eternal theme in social structure.\n\nThe structural fact is: eating, drinking, and breathing naturally possess legitimacy without needing legal-narrative justification, whereas the more a Quanli structure requires additional legitimacy narratives to compensate, the more deviated and distorted it becomes. Each additional correction produces more new deviations, requiring yet stronger correction next time, cycling to the end.",
"sig": "e4e390bc602e05b90a670937093bc65f548e9769861901d9da4973899fc116fdd92778909cc704fa7f3780cf12e89ebb15399dbe7d6f49fff5ae520f595b0526"
}