dragestil on Nostr: Musk vs Australia’s ‘you can’t say that’ surveillance state > As I argued in ...
Musk vs Australia’s ‘you can’t say that’ surveillance state
https://www.spectator.com.au/2024/04/musk-vs-australias-you-cant-say-that-surveillance-state/> As I argued in July last year, if an E-Safety department has to exist, it should only be concerned with:
> 1. Protecting children online from sex predators.
> 2. Stopping online scams.
> 3. Restraining provable foreign enemy psyops and disinformation.
> 4. Protecting free and fair elections, as well as freedom of speech.
> 5. Keeping Governments accountable.
Published at
2024-04-08 10:05:39Event JSON
{
"id": "18ea58267fd8be40af5e53da42ec8017dce5a17a2ffdd9b12bc06dfc0d83fa15",
"pubkey": "b21003fb5a59801229952ad6a7d05f6dedcb10a63b8537b92f937ed730702d86",
"created_at": 1712570739,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://hostux.social/users/dragestil/statuses/112235035995639582",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "Musk vs Australia’s ‘you can’t say that’ surveillance state\nhttps://www.spectator.com.au/2024/04/musk-vs-australias-you-cant-say-that-surveillance-state/\n\n\u003e As I argued in July last year, if an E-Safety department has to exist, it should only be concerned with:\n\u003e 1. Protecting children online from sex predators.\n\u003e 2. Stopping online scams.\n\u003e 3. Restraining provable foreign enemy psyops and disinformation.\n\u003e 4. Protecting free and fair elections, as well as freedom of speech.\n\u003e 5. Keeping Governments accountable.",
"sig": "797ed3834e32d203c528867dc67636a2b63ab05c7c7842951809a6d826803044b13f64cb087afae6fe176cd5011b85eeeef12f468942416eecba75d7e551f39a"
}