quoting
naddr1qq…tmccIntroduction
Drawing on his 1943 lectures, Erwin Schrödinger’s book What Is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell proposes that thermodynamic principles can explain how life arose (Schrödinger 1943). In these lectures, Schrödinger correctly points out that life seems to exist in a way that maintains order, resists the tendency toward disorder, and feeds on what he calls 'negative entropy'. Entropy is a quantitative measure of a system's disorder, representing the number of ways energy can be distributed among its constituent particles while producing the same observable macroscopic properties. The Second Law of Thermodynamics describes how this measure increases as energy in an isolated system becomes more dispersed and chaotic over time. This growth makes many natural processes effectively irreversible and implies that the entropy of the universe is always increasing. However, although the universe at large exhibits this continuous rise, biological life forms highly ordered structures; it does so not by violating the Second Law, but by acting as a dissipative system that absorbs low-entropy energy (for example, from the Sun) and releases higher-entropy energy back into its surroundings, thereby contributing to the overall increase.
To reiterate, life forming on earth can be viewed as a process stemming from the Second Law of Thermodynamic. The Sun releases energy, and the Earth, to absorb and dissipate this energy more efficiently, forms life. Consequently, the light from the Sun both informs and shapes biological life. A more proper understanding of human health stems from this appreciation and is the basis for the study of quantum biology.
The core pillars of health from a quantum biological point of view are light (visible and non-visible), water, and magnetism. While the reason for this are many, let us begin by exploring the role that light and water have in the movement of electrons in our body. In this article we will explore how the body uses proteins and structured water to conduct electricity across the body, and how artificial polarized light from our modern technology can disrupt this system. Furthermore, we will explore how artificial blue light from screens not only disrupt our conductive system, but disrupt our genetic expression and hormonal production related to our circadian rhythm. These disruptions not only impact our sleep, but our energy metabolism, body weight management, stress, and more.
Our Electric Body
Electrons are required for the processes of the electron-transport chain of our mitochondria. Most cells in the body contain mitochondria, which are smaller organelles that are responsible for energy metabolism in the body. They are the parts of our body that absorb energy from the sun and dissipate that energy. Not only is this process vital for the cosmic order, but the by-products of this process are essential for the healthy functioning of our bodies. Inside the mitochondria exists a chain of complexes, some containing light-sensitive chromophores, which are involved in moving electrons and protons around to produce water, CO2, ATP, and free radicals. Electrons are vital to this process and are needed for the process to work. This is why we eat food, because the electrons from both carbohydrates and fats are extracted for this process for metabolic use. However, this may not be the only way the body retrieves the electrons needed for cellular respiration.
Electrons may also come from the Earth itself. Research has now begun regarding the therapeutic benefits of grounding, because it involves the transfer of the Earth’s near infinite supply of electrons into the human body via the bottoms of our feet (Kshirsagar et al. 2025; Oschman, Chevalier, and Brown 2015; Chevalier et al. 2012). One reason for these benefits may be that the electrons act as antioxidants, neutralizing potentially harmful free radicals, which are generated in part as by-products of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (Oschman, Chevalier, and Brown 2015). In excess, these reactive molecules can disrupt normal cellular redox processes and damage lipids, proteins, and DNA, contributing to cellular dysfunction and disease. Additionally, the supply of electrons may simply be beneficial because they feed mitochondria the electrons needed for cellular respiration, just like food. This may be partially mediated by melanin, which is a reversible oxidation-reduction system, meaning it can go through both chemicals processes that allow it to lose and gain electrons (Figge 1939). This means that melanin can acts as a kind of battery, storing electrons for when they are needed. Therefore, it is possible the melanin, which does not only exist in our skin and hair, can receive electrons from the Earth, storing them, and providing them to mitochondria for the purpose of metabolism.
Following these conclusions brings us to a new question: how do these free electrons travel across the body? The answer here is found in water and proteins. Chiefly, it may involve structured water, in tandem with proteins with conjugated chromophores (conjugated π-systems) acting as semiconductors to move electrons around. Structured water is a special arrangement of water molecules that form next to hydrophilic (water-attracting) surfaces of cells. Unlike ordinary bulk water, whose molecules are randomly jiggling, structured water has an ordered, lattice-like arrangement of molecules. It’s generally negatively charged and pushes protons (positive charges) out into the surrounding water. This structure allows the water to behave differently from normal water. Structured water forms naturally when light, especially infrared light (which is abundant in sunlight) comes into contact with the water (Pollack 2022).
While water, likely given its ability to form structured water, is fundamental to life on Earth, it is best accompanied by carbon. Carbon is foundational to organic chemistry because of its four valence electrons. These four valence electrons give it the ability to form ringed structures that can absorb light and excite electrons. These rings are not only found in chlorophyl, which are renowned for their use in plants to absorb sunlight, but also hemoglobin and melanin. Melanin in-particular is being given attention within the scientific community because of its ability to be a very powerful semi-conductor (meaning it can allow for the movement of electrons) but this is made possible by its interaction with water (Mostert et al. 2012; Wünsche et al. 2015). While these ideas may seem outlandish and cutting edge, they are not entirely new. Research by Albert Szent-Györgyi, and others, back in the 1980s began to hypothesis that protons conduct across proteins and this movement of charge is dependent on the structure of water surrounding them (Gascoyne, Pethig, and Szent-Györgyi 1981). Later, researchers then hypothesized that this structured water that interfaces with the various proteins of the body can act as a channel for energy flow where the electrons move across the protein backbone, and protons through the water layer (Oschman 2009).
Polarized Light and Water Production
From this point of view, water is even more important as a structural material to our bodies than previously conceived in classical biology. Therefore, it is then important to reflect upon the fact that our mitochondria produce water through cellular respiration. While we typically consider the drinking of water as vital to our health in the modern age, we often neglect the fact that the body is organized to produce water itself. With that in mind, it is highly likely that the body can function without the need for drinking water entirely, especially considering that ancient human beings would have had scarce access to safe drinking water. However, the reason why we modern humans feel the need to drink so much water may be because our modern environments inhibit our mitochondria from producing enough water effectively.
There is reason to believe that polarized light, derived from nnEMF and artificial blue light from our screens impact our body’s ability to produce the water vital to our electric conductivity. Polarized light is electromagnetic radiation in which the electric‑field vectors oscillate primarily in one plane, rather than in random orientations. Sunlight arriving at Earth is largely unpolarized because its waves oscillate in all directions. Common sources that intentionally emit polarized light include polarized sunglasses (which filter out glare by allowing only one orientation of light to pass), smartphone screens, radio frequencies, and microwaves.
Along the mitochondrial membrane, there are 4 complexes involved in the electron transport chain. Complex III and IV (IV being Cytochrome C Oxidase) are both cytochromes, which means they have heme groups, which are porphyrin rings with an iron inside, making them capable of absorbing light. These complexes are not laid out in a chaotic soup, but rather are tightly structured and face each other in a certain direction (Vonck and Schäfer 2009). Furthermore, the photochemistry of Complex IV is orientation dependent, meaning that it will absorb light differently depending on the angle at which it is oriented relative to the direction of the light (Kunze and Junge 1977; Junge and DeVault 1975). This may not seem significant. However, consider how unpolarized light from the sun oscillates in all planes, meaning that it may indiscreetly be absorbed by Complex IV, regardless of orientation. Polarized light on the other hand, may have physiological impacts that are unnatural and detrimental. If Complex IV (Cytochrome C Oxidase) were to reduce in activity, it would be decreasing the rate at which it turns oxygen and two protons into water. Furthermore, in the attempt to perform this process it may incorrectly produce more reactive oxygen species, which in excess could prove harmful to the body. This may go to explain why there is a handful of research that indicate blue light suppresses metabolism, leading to reduced oxygen consumption and increases reactive oxygen species production (Kim et al. 2026). On top of that, research of rat brains also show that radio frequencies (RF) reduce Complex IV activity (Ammari et al. 2008). Meaning, artificial blue light and nnEMF may be deteriorating the function of Cytochrome C Oxidase, leading to less water being produced inside our cells. As water is vital for our physiologic function, as explained above, this dehydration caused by our modern technology has potential physiologic consequences far exceeding what may have been previously conceived.
Blue Light and Melanopsin
Not only does artificial blue light from our devices potentially dehydrate our bodies, but it also causes cascading issues across our metabolism. Our eyes contain rods, cones, and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs). Rods and cones are used for the detection of light for our visual senses. The ipRGCs differ in this regard as they are there to detect light for non-visual purposes of circadian rhythm modulation, the pupilar light reflex, and acute melatonin suppression (Buhr 2023). One of these receptors are melanopsin, and it is incredibly sensitive to blue light (~480nm) (Buhr 2023). The IpRGCs, such as melanopsin, send their signals along the retino-hypothalamic tract (RHT) directly to the suprachiasmatic nuclear (SCN) of the brain (Lucio-Enríquez et al. 2025). The SCN is the master circadian clock of the body and synchronizes peripheral clocks by regulating the autonomic nervous system and endocrine hormones, mainly adrenal glucocorticoids and pineal melatonin (Pickel and Sung 2020). A major purpose of these non-visual photo receptors in our eyes is to inform the SCN, our master clock, what the sun is doing and how we can synchronize with it. Included in its responsibilities, the SCN is directly involved in the diurnal rhythm of leptin secretion (Kalsbeek et al. 2001).
To understand this mechanism, let us go back in time. The Proopiomelanocortin (POMC) gene is ancient, with recognizable sequences in lamprey suggesting it existed ~ 700 million years ago, and it is conserved across all vertebrates (Hadley and Haskell-Luevano, n.d.). POMC is a gene that encodes a 31 kDa precursor protein; after translation the protein is proteolytically cleaved into several active peptide hormones, including ACTH, melanocyte‑stimulating hormones (α‑MSH, β‑MSH, γ‑MSH), and β‑endorphin (Hadley and Haskell-Luevano, n.d.). These peptides regulate stress (ACTH‑driven cortisol release), pigmentation (α‑MSH‑mediated melanogenesis), appetite/satiety (melanocortin‑4‑receptor signaling), and modulates immune function (α‑MSH anti‑inflammatory actions) (Hadley and Haskell-Luevano, n.d.).
The POMC gene is widely recognized for its relationship to leptin and mechanisms that lead towards obesity. Leptin is a hormone released by fat cells that involved in the regulation of body weight and energy homeostasis (Oswal and Yeo 2007; Zhou and Rui 2013). Both insulin and leptin bind to POMC neurons to promote the processing of α‑MSH to signal the decrease of energy intake (Baldini and Phelan 2019). In a starved state, leptin circulation decreases and there is increased activation of agouti-related neuropeptide (AgRP) and neuropeptide Y (NPY) (Baldini and Phelan 2019). Consequently, the loss of functioning of POMC and leptin deficiencies can lead to obesity (Nahon 2006; Oswal and Yeo 2007; Baldini and Phelan 2019). However, these signaling issues regarding leptin may not only come from an issue of decrease leptin production. Obesity can be argued as a consequence of leptin resistance, which is characterized by the body’s inability to respond to leptin signals that are meant to suppress appetite and weight gain (Zhou and Rui 2013). Naturally, it is easy to associate the development of leptin resistance to food intake. Studies in rats show that a high-fat diet leads to increase circulating leptin (Frederich et al. 1995). Many researchers then conclude that obesity is then caused when the body is resistant to the signals leptin is meant to express: i.e. a decrease in food intake (de Git and Adan 2015). This resistance is proposed to be the consequence of inflammation of the hypothalamus, potentially induced by high sugar and saturated fat diets (de Git and Adan 2015). While food and inflammation likely play a role in the development of leptin resistance, recall that inflammation can be a result of an overproduction of free radicals (such as reactive oxidative species), and can be more fundamentally understood as a metabolic issue (Conner and Grisham 1996). Given the theme of this article, in addition to the recognition that POMC is related to the circadian rhythm, we would be remise if we did not consider the role light plays in leptin resistance, POMC, and the blue light detecting melanopsin.
Our circadian rhythm carries a strong influence over our body weight and metabolism due to the relationship between POMC and the leptin melanocortin pathway. Light is a primary driver of this circadian rhythm, and research has begun to emerge that highlights the strong relationship that light can have on this system. For example, a study conducted in the year 2000 showed that hamsters showed a decreased body weight of 30% when their day was shortened, and a further 10% decrease in body wight when deprived of food (Mercer et al. 2000). This study suggests that light cycles can play a potentially larger role than food in this POMC system. Similarly, a rat study showed that supplementation of melatonin led to decrease appetite, decreased body weight, and a decrease in body fat, while removing the melatonin producing pineal gland lead to leptin-resistance (Buonfiglio et al. 2018). This study draws a clear link between leptin resistance and light exposure, as blue light is the signal to the body to suppress melatonin production (West et al. 2011). Artificial blue light at night can then artificially decrease melatonin production and increase the risk of leptin resistance. In humans, a 2014 study found that the timing of light exposure one experiences throughout the day was associated with body weight, and this was independent of caloric intake (Reid et al. 2014). These findings are enhanced by another 2015 study that found that adults exposed to blue-enriched light in the evening times had significantly higher glucose spikes than did individuals who were exposed to the same light in the morning (Cheung et al. 2016). These types of studies reinforce the idea that our light exposure, and more specifically the mismatch thereof due to artificial light, can affect our body weight, energy metabolism, and lead to leptin-resistance and disturbance of the POMC system.
The degree at which blue-light can influence the leptin-melanocortin pathway and POMC may not be local to its entrance into the eye either. Melanopsin is present in the fat cells of our body, with the highest concentration being in the fat cells under our skin (subcutaneous) (“GTEx Portal” n.d.). This makes sense as the body is placing the highest concentration of melanopsin-containing fat cells where blue light will reach it as blue light cannot pass deep into our bodies directly but a large percentage can penetrate the outer skin layers (Diffey 1980). The reason to do so would be to have light determine various bodily functions for time keeping purposes. This is reinforced by the evidence that blue light causes blood vessels to relax, as there is melanopsin (OPN4) in blood vessel cells so they can react to the placement of the Sun in the sky in natural conditions (Sikka et al. 2014). Similarly, research shows how blue light will significantly decrease the release of leptin in fat cells (Ondrusova et al. 2017). This evidence indicates that the saturation of blue light on our skin can artificially signal to the body a starved state, which would consequently lead to obesity.
The presentation of the above research is meant to highlight how the light we receive can greatly impact the leptin-melanocortin pathway and POMC expression, which influences sleep, energy metabolism, and stress. This then brings into question the severe health effects that blue light may have on our health, outside of circadian related disturbances. Recall that melanopsin is a photoreceptor in the eye that is highly sensitive to blue light. Furthermore, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the master circadian pacemaker which melanopsin interacts with, regulates rhythmic activity of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and thereby influences ACTH secretion through its projections to CRH neurons in the paraventricular nucleus (Kalsbeek et al. 2012; Gallo-Payet 2016). ACTH is released by the pituitary gland and signals the release of cortisol, a stress hormone of the body. In my book The Ancient Way of the Mind, I explore the hypothesis that our interpretation of reality is skewed when the mind is polluted by too much mental activity and ruminations (Bright 2025). One of the signs of a mind burdened by such activity is an overactivation of the sympathetic nervous system and ACTH and cortisol release. While beyond the scope of this article, it is interesting to consider the degree at which blue light, which interacts with similar stress systems, similarly influences our body’s ability to properly interpret reality itself.
Summary
Biological life, including the human body, evolved to channel the light from the Sun in accordance to the laws of thermodynamics. Our bodies are made up of proteins that act as semiconductors when they absorb light, and this process is possible by the presence of structured water. Water is fundamental to our health, including our body’s ability to facilitate the movement of electrons to feed our mitochondria. Not surprisingly then, mitochondria themselves produce water after receiving electrons from this electric current throughout the body and the electrons from the Earth. The health of our bodies is dependent on the proper flow of the electrons and the health of this structured water.
Our modern technological environment has dramatic consequences on this system and is toxic to our health. Polarized light from artificial blue-light and nnEMF effects our mitochondria’s ability to produce water and increase the risk of the production of too many free radicals. Furthermore, blue light disrupts our circadian rhythm which may influence many systems and possibly lead to obesity, mitochondrial dysfunction, and more. Given its influence on our stress systems, mood, and mental behavior, it then begs the question of how much these artificial polarized light sources influence our ability to interpret reality and grapple with the larger questions regarding the nature of our existence. On that same note, it then calls into question the degree at which the Sun can do the opposite: help align us with the truth.
With all of this in mind, it highlights the need for our modern society to reflect upon our technological environment. A new understanding of biology is emerging, the field of quantum biology. This understanding of the human body should make us cautious of our modern devices and help us shape a new direction on how to optimize our health and the well-being of all mankind.
References
Ammari, Mohamed, Anthony Lecomte, Mohsen Sakly, Hafedh Abdelmelek, and René de-Seze. 2008. “Exposure to GSM 900 MHz Electromagnetic Fields Affects Cerebral Cytochrome c Oxidase Activity.” Toxicology 250 (1): 70–74.
Baldini, Giulia, and Kevin D. Phelan. 2019. “The Melanocortin Pathway and Control of Appetite-Progress and Therapeutic Implications.” The Journal of Endocrinology 241 (1): R1–33.
Bright, Sydney. 2025. The Ancient Way of The Mind: How Modern Thinking Blinds Us From Wisdom of the Past. Bright Minds Consulting LLC.
Buhr, Ethan D. 2023. “Tangled up in Blue: Contribution of Short-Wavelength Sensitive Cones in Human Circadian Photoentrainment.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Buonfiglio, Daniella, Rafaela Parthimos, Rosana Dantas, Raysa Cerqueira Silva, Guilherme Gomes, Jéssica Andrade-Silva, Angela Ramos-Lobo, et al. 2018. “Melatonin Absence Leads to Long-Term Leptin Resistance and Overweight in Rats.” Frontiers in Endocrinology 9 (March): 122.
Cheung, Ivy N., Phyllis C. Zee, Dov Shalman, Roneil G. Malkani, Joseph Kang, and Kathryn J. Reid. 2016. “Morning and Evening Blue-Enriched Light Exposure Alters Metabolic Function in Normal Weight Adults.” PloS One 11 (5): e0155601.
Chevalier, Gaétan, Stephen T. Sinatra, James L. Oschman, Karol Sokal, and Pawel Sokal. 2012. “Earthing: Health Implications of Reconnecting the Human Body to the Earth’s Surface Electrons.” Journal of Environmental and Public Health 2012 (January): 291541.
Conner, E. M., and M. B. Grisham. 1996. “Inflammation, Free Radicals, and Antioxidants.” Nutrition (Burbank, Los Angeles County, Calif.) 12 (4): 274–77.
Diffey, B. L. 1980. “Ultraviolet Radiation Physics and the Skin.” Physics in Medicine and Biology 25 (3): 405–26.
Figge, Frank H. J. 1939. “Melanin: A Natural Reversible Oxidation-Reduction System and Indicator.” Experimental Biology and Medicine (Maywood, N.J.) 41 (1): 127.
Frederich, R. C., A. Hamann, S. Anderson, B. Löllmann, B. B. Lowell, and J. S. Flier. 1995. “Leptin Levels Reflect Body Lipid Content in Mice: Evidence for Diet-Induced Resistance to Leptin Action.” Nature Medicine 1 (12): 1311–14.
Gallo-Payet, Nicole. 2016. “60 YEARS OF POMC: Adrenal and Extra-Adrenal Functions of ACTH.” Journal of Molecular Endocrinology 56 (4): T135-56.
Gascoyne, P. R., R. Pethig, and A. Szent-Györgyi. 1981. “Water Structure-Dependent Charge Transport in Proteins.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 78 (1): 261–65.
Git, K. C. G. de, and R. A. H. Adan. 2015. “Leptin Resistance in Diet-Induced Obesity: The Role of Hypothalamic Inflammation: Leptin Resistance and Inflammation.” Obesity Reviews: An Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity 16 (3): 207–24.
“GTEx Portal.” n.d. Accessed March 4, 2026. https://www.gtexportal.org/home/gene/OPN4.
Hadley, Mac E., and Carrie Haskell-Luevano. n.d. “The Proopiomelanocortin System.”
Junge, W., and D. DeVault. 1975. “Symmetry, Orientation and Rotational Mobility in the A3 Heme of Cytochrome c Oxidase in the Inner Membrane of Mitochondria.” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 408 (3): 200–214.
Kalsbeek, A., E. Fliers, J. A. Romijn, S. E. La Fleur, J. Wortel, O. Bakker, E. Endert, and R. M. Buijs. 2001. “The Suprachiasmatic Nucleus Generates the Diurnal Changes in Plasma Leptin Levels.” Endocrinology 142 (6): 2677–85.
Kalsbeek, A., R. van der Spek, J. Lei, E. Endert, R. M. Buijs, and E. Fliers. 2012. “Circadian Rhythms in the Hypothalamo-Pituitary-Adrenal (HPA) Axis.” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology 349 (1): 20–29.
Kim, Eojin, Seoyoon Kim, Minseung Kim, and Duyoung Min. 2026. “Photooxidative Molecular Damage under Blue Light.” Experimental & Molecular Medicine 58 (1): 14–31.
Kshirsagar, Sudhir, Hemalata Deshmukh, Arubala P. Reddy, Aanya P. Reddy, and P. Hemachandra Reddy. 2025. “Grounding as a Complementary Intervention for Alzheimer’s Disease: Mechanisms, Evidence, and Potential Therapeutic Applications.” Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease: JAD 105 (4): 1239–51.
Kunze, U., and W. Junge. 1977. “Ellipticity of Cytochrome Alpha3 and Rotational Mobility of Cytochrome C-Oxidase in the Cristae Membrane of Mitochondria.” FEBS Letters 80 (2): 429–34.
Lucio-Enríquez, Kevin R., Mariazel Rubio-Valles, Arnulfo Ramos-Jiménez, and Jorge A. Pérez-León. 2025. “Human Melanopsin (OPN4) Gene Polymorphisms: A Systematic Review.” Frontiers in Neuroscience 19 (June): 1581266.
Mercer, J. G., K. M. Moar, A. W. Ross, N. Hoggard, and P. J. Morgan. 2000. “Photoperiod Regulates Arcuate Nucleus POMC, AGRP, and Leptin Receptor MRNA in Siberian Hamster Hypothalamus.” American Journal of Physiology. Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology 278 (1): R271-81.
Mostert, Albertus B., Benjamin J. Powell, Francis L. Pratt, Graeme R. Hanson, Tadeusz Sarna, Ian R. Gentle, and Paul Meredith. 2012. “Role of Semiconductivity and Ion Transport in the Electrical Conduction of Melanin.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (23): 8943–47.
Nahon, Jean Louis. 2006. “The Melanocortins and Melanin-Concentrating Hormone in the Central Regulation of Feeding Behavior and Energy Homeostasis.” Comptes Rendus - Biologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2006.03.021.
Ondrusova, Katarina, Mohammad Fatehi, Amy Barr, Zofia Czarnecka, Wentong Long, Kunimasa Suzuki, Scott Campbell, et al. 2017. “Subcutaneous White Adipocytes Express a Light Sensitive Signaling Pathway Mediated via a Melanopsin/TRPC Channel Axis.” Scientific Reports 7 (1): 16332.
Oschman, James L. 2009. “Charge Transfer in the Living Matrix.” Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies 13 (3): 215–28.
Oschman, James L., Gaétan Chevalier, and Richard Brown. 2015. “The Effects of Grounding (Earthing) on Inflammation, the Immune Response, Wound Healing, and Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Inflammatory and Autoimmune Diseases.” Journal of Inflammation Research 8 (March): 83–96.
Oswal, A., and G. S. H. Yeo. 2007. “The Leptin Melanocortin Pathway and the Control of Body Weight: Lessons from Human and Murine Genetics.” Obesity Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-789X.2007.00378.x.
Pickel, Lauren, and Hoon-Ki Sung. 2020. “Feeding Rhythms and the Circadian Regulation of Metabolism.” Frontiers in Nutrition 7 (April): 39.
Pollack, Gerald H. 2022. “EZ Water and the Origin of Life.” Annual Research & Review in Biology, August, 18–28.
Reid, Kathryn J., Giovanni Santostasi, Kelly G. Baron, John Wilson, Joseph Kang, and Phyllis C. Zee. 2014. “Timing and Intensity of Light Correlate with Body Weight in Adults.” PloS One 9 (4): e92251.
Schrödinger, Erwin. 1943. What Is Life? The Physical Aspect of the Living Cell. Cambridge University Press.
Sikka, Gautam, G. Patrick Hussmann, Deepesh Pandey, Suyi Cao, Daijiro Hori, Jong Taek Park, Jochen Steppan, et al. 2014. “Melanopsin Mediates Light-Dependent Relaxation in Blood Vessels.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (50): 17977–82.
Vonck, Janet, and Eva Schäfer. 2009. “Supramolecular Organization of Protein Complexes in the Mitochondrial Inner Membrane.” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 1793 (1): 117–24.
West, Kathleen E., Michael R. Jablonski, Benjamin Warfield, Kate S. Cecil, Mary James, Melissa A. Ayers, James Maida, et al. 2011. “Blue Light from Light-Emitting Diodes Elicits a Dose-Dependent Suppression of Melatonin in Humans.” Journal of Applied Physiology (Bethesda, Md.: 1985) 110 (3): 619–26.
Wünsche, Julia, Yingxin Deng, Prajwal Kumar, Eduardo Di Mauro, Erik Josberger, Jonathan Sayago, Alessandro Pezzella, et al. 2015. “Protonic and Electronic Transport in Hydrated Thin Films of the Pigment Eumelanin.” Chemistry of Materials 27 (2): 436–42.
Zhou, Yingjiang, and Liangyou Rui. 2013. “Leptin Signaling and Leptin Resistance.” Frontiers of Medicine 7 (2): 207–22.
brightmindsco on Nostr: Leave the cave and shadows, find the Sun. ...
Leave the cave and shadows, find the Sun.
