Openness, not Decentralization.
That’s what people want.
The whole point of decentralized models is non-excludability/censorship resistance.
When people say decentralization, that’s what they mean, but most are unaware.
You can have decentralization and lose openness.
permissionlessness = self-sufficiency, and openness.
open = non-excludability
self-sufficiency = pays for itself
what trustless means in the Bitcoin context ("no trusted third parties").
money that can be trusted bc is permissionless (open + self-sufficient)
nnova.btc /
npub1r9…qemmr
2023-03-28 13:56:15
in reply to nevent1q…x78z
Author Public Key
npub1r9v8kp50rjx22rqwjsk3ymugtn0d6pm4m4pezfmvee5ph5q85t0s7qemmrPublished at
2023-03-28 13:56:15Event JSON
{
"id": "8dab731d57eadd66752fb16800689b1cab073d69e2b1c00e7086e117d24141dc",
"pubkey": "19587b068f1c8ca50c0e942d126f885cdedd0775dd4391276cce681bd007a2df",
"created_at": 1680011775,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"6e468422dfb74a5738702a8823b9b28168abab8655faacb6853cd0ee15deee93",
"wss://nostr.wine",
"Gigi ⚡💜"
],
[
"e",
"ba940a9937f17dd64eaaa4376a9d610929cd94f9059e8b0ea2f316561874daa1",
"wss://nos.lol",
"reply"
],
[
"client",
"coracle"
]
],
"content": "Openness, not Decentralization. \n\n\nThat’s what people want. \n\n\nThe whole point of decentralized models is non-excludability/censorship resistance. \n\n\nWhen people say decentralization, that’s what they mean, but most are unaware. \n\n\nYou can have decentralization and lose openness.\n\n\n\n\n\npermissionlessness = self-sufficiency, and openness. \n\nopen = non-excludability \n\nself-sufficiency = pays for itself \n\nwhat trustless means in the Bitcoin context (\"no trusted third parties\"). \n\nmoney that can be trusted bc is permissionless (open + self-sufficient)",
"sig": "991b08c44d6e903a566f1dc97b95ce35ed3f33a0bf3b7c1d7ccecef9bc34a7162e37fb36618a768513bdd8e22e7d2cf3829402d713c82d1e61849d6aa60433ff"
}