Greg Egan on Nostr: In 1909, Arthur Wieferich proved that if 𝑥ᵖ+𝑦ᵖ=𝑧ᵖ for an odd prime ...
In 1909, Arthur Wieferich proved that if
𝑥ᵖ+𝑦ᵖ=𝑧ᵖ
for an odd prime 𝑝 that does not divide positive integers 𝑥, 𝑦, or 𝑧, then
𝑝² must divide 2ᵖ⁻¹−1
Fermat’s little theorem says 𝑝 itself always divides 2ᵖ⁻¹−1.
Soon afterwards, Dmytro Grave checked every prime under 1000, and conjectured that no such “Wieferich Primes” exist!
Then in 1913, Waldemar Meissner checked 1093 …
Now that we have computers this is trivial, but in 1913 it was a slog. Meissner showed that 2³⁶⁴−1 was divisible by 1093², and since 1093 – 1 = 3 × 364, and 𝑡³−1 is divisible by 𝑡−1, that’s enough.
Later, Emil Haentzschel pointed out that 2¹⁸²+1 is divisible by 1093², which does the same job because 𝑡⁶−1 is divisible by 𝑡+1. Just how annoying this was to Meissner has not been recorded.
Published at
2026-07-23 07:25:32 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "841e6e05fad6d3e2a5bfadb98ed7a594cb0cb63b9e4f945f9127a60b47438118",
"pubkey": "563821004c3e4e4f4fbef74a2657db3299a0e71a78214bf97db0b6ca05fb73d3",
"created_at": 1784791532,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mathstodon.xyz/@gregeganSF/116968097872853085",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mathstodon.xyz/users/gregeganSF/statuses/116968097872853085",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://mathstodon.xyz/users/gregeganSF/statuses/116968097872853085",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "In 1909, Arthur Wieferich proved that if\n\n𝑥ᵖ+𝑦ᵖ=𝑧ᵖ\n\nfor an odd prime 𝑝 that does not divide positive integers 𝑥, 𝑦, or 𝑧, then\n\n𝑝² must divide 2ᵖ⁻¹−1\n\nFermat’s little theorem says 𝑝 itself always divides 2ᵖ⁻¹−1.\n\nSoon afterwards, Dmytro Grave checked every prime under 1000, and conjectured that no such “Wieferich Primes” exist!\n\nThen in 1913, Waldemar Meissner checked 1093 …\n\nNow that we have computers this is trivial, but in 1913 it was a slog. Meissner showed that 2³⁶⁴−1 was divisible by 1093², and since 1093 – 1 = 3 × 364, and 𝑡³−1 is divisible by 𝑡−1, that’s enough.\n\nLater, Emil Haentzschel pointed out that 2¹⁸²+1 is divisible by 1093², which does the same job because 𝑡⁶−1 is divisible by 𝑡+1. Just how annoying this was to Meissner has not been recorded.",
"sig": "75a9270e7084fa239968db592fd55d5c8ecd26f9c841a9d351a4f877549f05af95ecfe070dc31faab61345aec008b5ad0e5a50703f4799a76880f1de14ac3e06"
}