Additionally, I found a related note to share:
quotingEven for Atheists, there is a more logical explanation than “Evolution”.
nevent1q…rn9t
While micro-evolution (adaptation and genetic optimization) is of course true, macro-evolution is wrong, it is not “science”, it’s a religion. I say that because normally when a theory is presented with disqualifying evidence, the theory gets rejected… with evolution, the evidence is simply discarded, usually with a statement like “well it’s so advanced and complex you just can’t intuitively understand it”. This is because the ‘theory’ of evolution has actually turned in to the ‘religion’ of evolution.
Now—the theory of evolution states that macro evolution is achieved through a compilation of millions of micro-evolutions that stack up over time.
Micro-evolution of course is not glued to the ‘theory of evolution’, it existed long before Darwin, humans have been selectively breeding plants based on the understanding of micro-evolution for as long as we’ve been writing. Micro-evolution is true, not disputed, and should be believed by Atheists and Theists alike.
There are many contradicting pieces of evidence across species, many species have biological attributes that can’t possibly have been gradually adapted towards:
• Consider the bullet shrimp for example, this is a shrimp that has a special claw which snaps shut so fast (~100 feet per second [think about how long 100ft is]) that it actually creates a vaccuum bubble out of thin a-… out of thin water. This bubble reaches temperatures around the surface of the sun, and stuns its opponents. This is a physics phenomenon (cavitation) which only occurs when a certain speed threshold is reached which causes the H2O to vaporize then condense leading to a vacuum bubble. This is not something that can be slowly worked towards, it’s a hard threshold you must cross and before that speed is reached, nothing will happen. There is no reasonable explanation for the shrimp adapting a special claw mechanism that allows for this speed of snap (and it’s a special claw, it’s not both claws, only one “developed” [allegedly] these multiple new internal claw ‘parts’ to allow for these insane speeds).
• Consider the common butterfly, when a caterpillar cocoons, it actually dissolves into a “soup” of cells, which then ‘crystallizes’ into a new thing entirely, a butterfly. There is literally zero chance that was somehow gradually adapted towards.
• There are countless other examples like these. From animals and plants alike.
Additionally, consider how macro-evolution would even work in terms of reproduction. Your offspring with the genetic variation (micro variation) would still be sexually compatible with those without it, if macro-evolution is the stacking of millions of these changes you would not expect hard reproductive compatibility lines between species, instead the more micro-evolutions you stack, the less compatible you’d become, gradually, with others who don’t have as many of the micro-changes. So compatibility would gradually go from 100% to 0% across thousands of changes. We should expect to see a wide gradient of species fanned out between each other, instead we have firm distinct homogenous types with nothing in-between, the species should be like a long blurred line between each other…
You don’t even have to be a Theist to believe a better theory than this. It is more rational and logical to believe (and I’m suggesting you do consider this) that advanced aliens came to our planet and genetically engineered most, or even all, life we see. That is a much better theory than evolution. It’s even still a scientific theory, as it has support from the statistics involving the size of the universe and likelihood of aliens. It still sufficiently explains genetic similarities in species. I personally believe in God (YHWH) doing the genetic engineering, but to each their own.
Source: x.com/Valuable/status/1796470626133406182