utxo the webmaster 🧑‍💻 (nprofile…tkue) removed #Amber support from #Wisp and now requires nsec stored locally in the app.
Curious about the reasoning.
The threat model for client-level compromise is worse with local storage—nsec never passes through the client when signing is handled by Amber. "On device" isn't the same as "isolated."
What problem were you solving?
Ava
npub1f6…azcka
2026-05-26 12:49:12 UTC
Author Public Key
npub1f6ugxyxkknket3kkdgu4k0fu74vmshawermkj8d06sz6jts9t4kslazckaSeen on
wss://nostr.winePublished at
2026-05-26 12:49:12 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "88ff789fade7b07ef72f796a6d84b22bc520637a8a74021d58358f92bbdaf5ed",
"pubkey": "4eb88310d6b4ed95c6d66a395b3d3cf559b85faec8f7691dafd405a92e055d6d",
"created_at": 1779799752,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"A short note: nostr:nprofile1qqsw9n8heusyq0el9f99tveg7r0rhcu9tzn..."
],
[
"p",
"e2ccf7cf20403f3f2a4a55b328f0de3be38558a7d5f33632fdaaefc726c1c8eb",
"wss://relay.bitcoinpark.com/"
],
[
"t",
"Amber"
],
[
"t",
"amber"
],
[
"t",
"Wisp"
],
[
"t",
"wisp"
],
[
"client",
"Amethyst"
]
],
"content": "nostr:nprofile1qqsw9n8heusyq0el9f99tveg7r0rhcu9tznatuekxt764m78ymqu36cpr3mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucnfw33k76twwpshy6ewvdhk6tcpzamhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgtcpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhs5gtkue removed #Amber support from #Wisp and now requires nsec stored locally in the app.\n\nCurious about the reasoning. \n\nThe threat model for client-level compromise is worse with local storage—nsec never passes through the client when signing is handled by Amber. \"On device\" isn't the same as \"isolated.\"\n\nWhat problem were you solving?",
"sig": "acae3a0fc087d29e670ca2c8804880230a96f7db3eb34527e2f46394d60573eafffea0954e6f839f9bfe0e8bfe5df6ea37af1154b8c3f2c3283ad2a3fe196a98"
}