reclaimthenet on Nostr: 🚨 TikTok sues the US government over divestiture bill. Here are its key arguments: ...
🚨 TikTok sues the US government over divestiture bill.
Here are its key arguments:
Unprecedented and Discriminatory Legislation: TikTok argues the Act is uniquely discriminatory as it targets a single platform, restricting the speech of millions of Americans.
Violation of First Amendment Rights: TikTok contends that the Act violates the First Amendment by imposing a content-based and speaker-based ban on the platform.
Impractical Divestiture Requirements: The Act's divestiture option is deemed infeasible by TikTok, labeling it as non-viable both technically and legally within the given timeframe.
Lack of Substantive Justification: TikTok criticizes the lack of concrete evidence or legislative findings to support the claim that TikTok presents a national security threat.
Existence of Less Restrictive Alternatives: TikTok argues that less restrictive security measures it proposed were ignored in favor of an extreme and unnecessary ban.
Published at
2024-05-07 16:50:15Event JSON
{
"id": "9133c54fc20947fbe539a87e2a3c83952db01fcee19485f67992731d72d36145",
"pubkey": "e58143f793e4bf805a4df6cdc0289e352b3cf08a7b3e6afaaf89dd497bf0f4a6",
"created_at": 1715100615,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"r",
"https://image.nostr.build/d1ccab5847828424a10e592484cc7b7041017e54c0942f200e5130e03256e2fb.jpg"
]
],
"content": "🚨 TikTok sues the US government over divestiture bill.\n\nHere are its key arguments:\n\nUnprecedented and Discriminatory Legislation: TikTok argues the Act is uniquely discriminatory as it targets a single platform, restricting the speech of millions of Americans.\n\nViolation of First Amendment Rights: TikTok contends that the Act violates the First Amendment by imposing a content-based and speaker-based ban on the platform.\n\nImpractical Divestiture Requirements: The Act's divestiture option is deemed infeasible by TikTok, labeling it as non-viable both technically and legally within the given timeframe.\n\nLack of Substantive Justification: TikTok criticizes the lack of concrete evidence or legislative findings to support the claim that TikTok presents a national security threat.\n\nExistence of Less Restrictive Alternatives: TikTok argues that less restrictive security measures it proposed were ignored in favor of an extreme and unnecessary ban.\n\nhttps://image.nostr.build/d1ccab5847828424a10e592484cc7b7041017e54c0942f200e5130e03256e2fb.jpg",
"sig": "fe94bc3a7df14fc44b3d61101de3087a9e16842aa166d3ffe7e49b898fa0efba13f59ed83512b40a60ec0cbc449b861127360611d03c2ad07afe98c61e8e474f"
}