quotingThis is a debate between an intuitive perceiver (Time), and a sensory judger (Andrew), which by virtue of their personality design resonate with differing language, the intuitive perceiver resonating the most with what's most true philosophically, and the sensory judger resonating the most with defending tradition and duty. They can derive from the same point, God, but they stylistically have very different approaches to talking about what they believe.
nevent1q…2vx8
This distinction between general personality types is why certain people "get" Bitcoin (like saylor (nprofile…mhjz) , Jeff Booth (nprofile…mwnq) ) , and certain people don't get Bitcoin (Peter Schiff). The former are intuitive, and the latter is sensory. Intuitive types are inclined to use conceptual, abstract, technical language and are comfortable with realities they can't see, touch, taste, etc, while sensory types are inclined to used concrete language and are comfortable in a reality that is largely defined by the five senses, and feel uncomfortable with trusting non-concrete, abstract, conceptual, technical language.
https://youtu.be/fKaro9zAiVc?si=z5Sv8yNS2xTfwzhw
Nunyabidness on Nostr: "[The] sensory judger resonating the most with defending tradition and duty. " ...
"[The] sensory judger resonating the most with defending tradition and duty. "
