Jack of all trades on Nostr: Even some of the discourses counter each other just fine, e.g. techno-optimists will ...

Even some of the discourses counter each other just fine, e.g. techno-optimists will happily argue with doomers.

That's why I don't see most of this list as discourses of climate delay, but rather discourses of climate solutions.

Because if we exclude all of these arguments as invalid, what does that leave us?

1/3