jesterchen42 on Nostr: npub1hvdfn…69sq9 If that statement in the blog post were true, why didn't they put ...
npub1hvdfn5ne7zvks3ztfewr00vdjv3kve4nddht43p8fjepc8rn6yasz69sq9 (npub1hvd…9sq9) If that statement in the blog post were true, why didn't they put it in the TOS? If they don't have such intentions, why no grace period to accept (or reject!) the new TOS?