Suppose that Congress resolved, by a simple majority, that Trump engaged in insurrection and is therefore ineligible for any office of the United States?
Such a resolution shouldn’t be necessary, under the Constitution’s plain language, but after Trump v Anderson, that would do it, right?
Steve Randy Waldman
npub153…zcaex
2025-03-04 15:11:56 UTC
Author Public Key
npub153lsl0t8k7ug7aksd42ykr04h0rqpjfcya9s4d49nahpn6xfj4lq7zcaexPublished at
2025-03-04 15:11:56 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "908761e1c54be3c70b9a2612857c50550a4977ccf67f4e1a4b86351fd0e31022",
"pubkey": "a47f0fbd67b7b88f76d06d544b0df5bbc600c938274b0ab6a59f6e19e8c9957e",
"created_at": 1741101116,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://zirk.us/@interfluidity/114104802752586117",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://zirk.us/users/interfluidity/statuses/114104802752586117",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://zirk.us/users/interfluidity/statuses/114104802752586117",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Suppose that Congress resolved, by a simple majority, that Trump engaged in insurrection and is therefore ineligible for any office of the United States?\n\nSuch a resolution shouldn’t be necessary, under the Constitution’s plain language, but after Trump v Anderson, that would do it, right?",
"sig": "4b22873c9ec45d00dbbcbada3d6442c1fe2dd65aedabc773ace1fea09ef9bc97e57b3f9b049a3c8f0244b09b10a3d5e15a61cb58ce69ba621fa363ddeaf8ac9e"
}