Join Nostr
2024-10-17 00:58:26 UTC

John Carlos Baez on Nostr: I loved this lecture by Nina Arkani-Hamed. He has a nice way of presenting things as ...

I loved this lecture by Nina Arkani-Hamed. He has a nice way of presenting things as a story.

After he gets rolling here, he explains how particle physicists could discover some famous shapes called "associahedra" just by keeping track of the poles in the scattering matrix. Since I know associahedra from category theory and topology, this is astounding!

He also keeps prerequisites to a minimum. Well, okay: if you don't have a physics PhD don't watch this. You need to know the Feynman rules, and how Feynman diagrams have poles when the energy-momentum of a virtual particle is 'on shell' - i.e., takes a value that a real particle can have.

It also helps to have seen how Feynman diagrams for gauge bosons look like they're made of ribbons. But this shows up only at first.

What I don't love is how he covers up some of his assumptions. He's talking about a spin-0 field Φ of mass m that takes values in the Lie algebra su(n), with a cubic self-interaction

tr(Φ³)

This is not like our universe! When he sets m=0 this theory would apply to nonexistent 'spin-zero gluons'.

More importantly, he only considers planar, tree-shaped Feynman diagrams! This restriction kicks in naturally only when we consider the limit n → ∞. Things simplify a lot then.

So, while this is the best talk I've heard in a long time, there's a bit of salesmanship involved here. And by the time the pop science media get ahold of his work, they say stuff like "physicists have discovered a jewel-shaped geometric object that challenges the notion that space and time are fundamental constituents of nature". 🤢

But still, a great talk.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lJwn4R3PeNc