Event JSON
{
"id": "990cf0455309cc81d67ffc99c1f30764bc5b5848cc11f4bafb2fe16665f79088",
"pubkey": "27e3698a0d02cdc148f79bce2c0da110f0ac51e2e697f9fde7bcf730711dfaeb",
"created_at": 1730744348,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://neuromatch.social/@sls/113426061613575279",
"web"
],
[
"imeta",
"url https://media.neuromatch.social/media_attachments/files/113/426/054/780/781/837/original/95f0cfb1e64f21b5.png",
"m image/png"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://neuromatch.social/users/sls/statuses/113426061613575279",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://neuromatch.social/users/sls/statuses/113426061613575279",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Big paper from the International Brain Lab group: https://elifesciences.org/reviewed-preprints/100840 One takeaway is that using stereotaxic coordinates involves variance which \"... is sizeable enough to impact probe targeting to desired brain regions and poses a limit on the resolution of probe targeting.\" Lots of labs do posthoc histology verification, which can help.\n\nFunctional targeting is my favorite. Here's a figure from the supplement to one of our preprints. Functional targeting is way better than using skull landmarks. https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.08.27.555017v1\nhttps://media.neuromatch.social/media_attachments/files/113/426/054/780/781/837/original/95f0cfb1e64f21b5.png\n",
"sig": "8861f89844280643c259213df6aeb435d05099f64d3932e119e3d30cf468f1346bcbe3d540947b0aa605a6bf43bfd951534d9313a03ef073bde8220822c4bb1c"
}