We are sold KYC, AML and surveillance as protection, while the Bank of England moves to restrict 'unhosted wallets' to keep activity within intermediated systems in the name of stability and control.
These rules do little to curb illicit flows but expand data collection, erode privacy, impose costs, and add friction and limit access through banks and intermediaries.
Self custody removes that layer entirely, exposing the limits of that approach.
When policymakers shaping these rules have never used a wallet or sent a transaction, that gap in understanding gets written into policy.
What’s being sold as protection is harm.
Further context in the articles below.
fnew (nprofile…8cwv) Roxom TV (nprofile…9m7x)
