Similar to NostResume, grant foundations such as OpenSats (nprofile…pqk6) could significantly lower the time it takes to sift through applicants with a WoT-based application system.
Nostr client that:
1. Allows anyone to add a project that they wish to get funded.
2. Displays relevant links and or shows your github activity if developer
3. Option to reveal funding amount, or keep it open (let the foundation find the right project, and then discuss funding amounts)
4. Foundation benefits by narrowing down candidates based on WoT, OR other filter criteria (doesn’t need to be wot-based).
5. This process creates transparency, and people can see what’s being applied for, and not have to duplicate the same requests. If there are 10 applications to build YET ANOTHER twitter clone, applicant can see that perhaps it’s a waste of time, and propose something else.
This could be merged with NostResume somehow so that info is readily available
What this accomplishes:
1. Transparency to the process
2. Saves time sifting through many applications
3. Clarity regarding what type of projects are getting funded
4. Clarity regarding desired level of PoW sought by the funding committee
Thoughts?
Karnage
npub1r0…sq9ac
2024-09-20 05:57:26
Author Public Key
npub1r0rs5q2gk0e3dk3nlc7gnu378ec6cnlenqp8a3cjhyzu6f8k5sgs4sq9acPublished at
2024-09-20 05:57:26Event JSON
{
"id": "96d34b5cb84c6dd24d29b3a4d73211803768a9d68694f5f9c0c14b7a5447bd9a",
"pubkey": "1bc70a0148b3f316da33fe3c89f23e3e71ac4ff998027ec712b905cd24f6a411",
"created_at": 1726811846,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"p",
"787338757fc25d65cd929394d5e7713cf43638e8d259e8dcf5c73b834eb851f2"
]
],
"content": "Similar to NostResume, grant foundations such as nostr:nprofile1qqs8suecw4luyht9ekff89x4uacneapk8r5dyk0gmn6uwwurf6u9rusdepqk6 could significantly lower the time it takes to sift through applicants with a WoT-based application system. \n\nNostr client that:\u2028\u2028\n1. Allows anyone to add a project that they wish to get funded. \n2. Displays relevant links and or shows your github activity if developer\n3. Option to reveal funding amount, or keep it open (let the foundation find the right project, and then discuss funding amounts)\n4. Foundation benefits by narrowing down candidates based on WoT, OR other filter criteria (doesn’t need to be wot-based). \n5. This process creates transparency, and people can see what’s being applied for, and not have to duplicate the same requests. If there are 10 applications to build YET ANOTHER twitter clone, applicant can see that perhaps it’s a waste of time, and propose something else. \n\nThis could be merged with NostResume somehow so that info is readily available \n\nWhat this accomplishes:\n\n1. Transparency to the process\n2. Saves time sifting through many applications\n3. Clarity regarding what type of projects are getting funded\n4. Clarity regarding desired level of PoW sought by the funding committee\n\nThoughts?",
"sig": "c6b5d4380db4633bde23cfcc9cf3679a1c3ecc3cdd106667f886b623e15a0109568f94bc8873f4eeeca053419baf23f8b226af6c5727ad2eab27824ae782e3f0"
}