Your entire argument is: "Since a thing is possible, we may as well remove all barriers to entry & consequences for that thing", which is completely retarded. 🤷♂️
Anyone can pick up a gun & shoot someone. Should we then remove all murder laws & associated consequences? 🤔
Anyone can steal someone's property. Should we just remove all property rights? 😒
What I'm suggesting is that any deterrent to harmful acts is inherently better than removing all resistance & friction to committing the harmful act. 💁♂️
The latter is the logic you're using & it's low-IQ as fuck. 🤙
