npub14k23hl0c7a0ecs42wndgxg4l7w9ve03jtdlg48hvj93zdtq2cf9q3ted68 (npub14k2…ed68) npub1unjuck2mx2gck4ww6cmyj9q8ce4lng3qmu59a8nk6h6hrckrm7ls47s8w5 (npub1unj…s8w5)
It should be quite easy to monitor him. I agree with the analyst who says this is why PET seems to have done nothing. From a counterespionage point of view expelling spies from an embassy is usually counterproductive because you lose all your data on them and have to work to uncover the new ones who will come, and who may be illegal and hence harder to monitor.
But I'd like to know whether the previous attaché was SVU (information gathering) rather than GRU (thugs).