“Chinese Satellite Crushes Starlink With 2-Watt Laser Fired From 36,000 KM in Space”
High-throughput optical link from a geostationary satellite. Not really apples to apples comparison to Starlink. GEO prioritizes broad coverage and capacity, while LEO prioritizes real-time responsiveness.
#technology
https://dailygalaxy.com/2025/11/chinese-satellite-crushes-starlink-2-watt-laser-fired-in-space/
danielkhent / Daniel Khent
npub142…2yxtr
2025-11-22 18:15:26 UTC
Author Public Key
npub14220dfycvhzu9hzmzwwks0a96a6hf246r784zzhd5qq5sfjgpcdsq2yxtrSeen on
wss://relay.damus.ioPublished at
2025-11-22 18:15:26 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "dfaea197da87a3c7d2012c44b7e972ea5b2758a0fb40eab316513a5911063055",
"pubkey": "aa94f6a49865c5c2dc5b139d683fa5d77574aaba1f8f510aeda0014826480e1b",
"created_at": 1763835326,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"client",
"Yakihonne",
"31990:20986fb83e775d96d188ca5c9df10ce6d613e0eb7e5768a0f0b12b37cdac21b3:1700732875747"
],
[
"t",
"technology"
]
],
"content": "“Chinese Satellite Crushes Starlink With 2-Watt Laser Fired From 36,000 KM in Space”\n\nHigh-throughput optical link from a geostationary satellite. Not really apples to apples comparison to Starlink. GEO prioritizes broad coverage and capacity, while LEO prioritizes real-time responsiveness.\n\n#technology\n\n https://dailygalaxy.com/2025/11/chinese-satellite-crushes-starlink-2-watt-laser-fired-in-space/",
"sig": "d2c683df9aa484e2ad9e58eff654c3acd16aeae400f01174aa2951dbdbd0addc516d38ab53ffe597e7abb28f88277dcc42c89430afe7f63322f065a31f9e934c"
}