Sam Stephens on Nostr: >That argument presupposes that software can't be simply finished. That a codebase is ...

>That argument presupposes that software can't be simply finished. That a codebase is ever-evolving, never done.

Fair, but I suspect not many codebases are ever finished; only code built for certain purposes can be finished. I've been in business software for most of my life (digressing through AWS), and no codebase I ever worked with in business finished, because businesses are always evolving, and requirements are always changing.

I think my thoughts apply to most codebases.