After spending some time familiarising myself with pywavelets, I have found that an R library (WaveletComp) is probably more convenient. It has confidence intervals (pywavelets not at the moment of writing), and the cone of influence seems to be automatic.
pywavelets is a generic tool for wavelets, while WaveComp is more focused on statistics for time series. I tend to go directly to Python, and I think I need to change my default when thinking in software to do somewhat advanced statistics.
David Quintero
npub1qf…ar5tc
2024-09-12 22:24:43 UTC
Author Public Key
npub1qf9e7fukukmnxlhnvk2l34cflucf40vmdjwyk78luj6l8yy97kxq7ar5tcSeen on
wss://relay.momostr.pinkPublished at
2024-09-12 22:24:43 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "dd3c09fd4f04621c1d77f0e2b615f4f274b4c2347fde831586822fed5a4e896d",
"pubkey": "024b9f2796e5b7337ef36595f8d709ff309abd9b6c9c4b78ffe4b5f39085f58c",
"created_at": 1726179883,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mathstodon.xyz/@davidsuculum/113126924867994947",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mathstodon.xyz/users/davidsuculum/statuses/113126924867994947",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://mathstodon.xyz/users/davidsuculum/statuses/113126924867994947",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "After spending some time familiarising myself with pywavelets, I have found that an R library (WaveletComp) is probably more convenient. It has confidence intervals (pywavelets not at the moment of writing), and the cone of influence seems to be automatic.\n\npywavelets is a generic tool for wavelets, while WaveComp is more focused on statistics for time series. I tend to go directly to Python, and I think I need to change my default when thinking in software to do somewhat advanced statistics.",
"sig": "0d11d215fb6ab5fbc9a08057971d55cbce77bb157218ce914836971d95773b1b5535c8d0972e1282db3a363a5c1cf98112cb43f85c9450ec35f881087e2e7ad7"
}