We’re past 5, so I just want to highlight how wild it is that SCOTUS hasn’t even ruled on a DOJ request to allow it to partially enforce this rule during appeals.
At this point, the only acceptable reason is if they’re denying it but someone dissenting is still writing.
Chris Geidner /
npub1ah…9sqwn
2024-08-01 21:48:46
in reply to nevent1q…vhx9
Author Public Key
npub1ahdt40ysdldh5rguwkhzyazz48nyjvh4rux3nj3ytcc3fq0ec3ss59sqwnPublished at
2024-08-01 21:48:46Event JSON
{
"id": "515ef808724c3810fcdfa05617a98a1b1dd828b16b47f271a8e3cc23facb95fe",
"pubkey": "eddababc906fdb7a0d1c75ae227442a9e64932f51f0d19ca245e311481f9c461",
"created_at": 1722548926,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"e",
"58968bda539a0d8aab693dc0c870f328d9dd27cecde193a5aaeaabb5d3f56ae5",
"wss://relay.mostr.pub",
"reply"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://journa.host/users/chrisgeidner/statuses/112888966415575486",
"activitypub"
]
],
"content": "We’re past 5, so I just want to highlight how wild it is that SCOTUS hasn’t even ruled on a DOJ request to allow it to partially enforce this rule during appeals. \n\nAt this point, the only acceptable reason is if they’re denying it but someone dissenting is still writing.",
"sig": "ec6634b035db6ca1202a827c9ba31d20efab42daf0bedbaf958fbed6898c4a62476db69a432781c9532620675472ef972edb260aec42344fc499c470827d37f8"
}