Can they qualify anti science? Because "trust the people who say what science is to ...

2026-01-22 20:45:18 UTC

Can they qualify anti science? Because "trust the people who say what science is to conduct science properly" is antithetical to the scientific method. The scientific method should be used to validate all research. To examine and criticize existing work and conclusions, learn how one can validate it, or at least move the validation to someone who is trustworthy to the individuals directly impacted by research & medicine. coachemma (nprofile…zeku) MedSchlr (nprofile…5l99)

Author Public Key

npub1m3xdppkd0njmrqe2ma8a6ys39zvgp5k8u22mev8xsnqp4nh80srqhqa5sf

Seen on

wss://yabu.me

Show more details

Published at

2026-01-22 20:45:18 UTC

Kind type

1 Short Text Note

Event JSON

{ "id": "566b2150db10b0136f0423254b368879402055c1a2c4781ef943e0c07b62f5c9", "pubkey": "dc4cd086cd7ce5b1832adf4fdd1211289880d2c7e295bcb0e684c01acee77c06", "created_at": 1769114718, "kind": 1, "tags": [ [ "alt", "A short note: Can they qualify anti science? Because \"trust the..." ], [ "e", "8808e3bd8ec8dbc13626e30e9a157482f2162387386eebc45a63da2901cffc3b", "wss://nos.lol/", "root", "4d7842051782e0d3feb034d150adc2b6bae4ee3b49786793bffa468b6f5b96b3" ], [ "p", "4d7842051782e0d3feb034d150adc2b6bae4ee3b49786793bffa468b6f5b96b3", "wss://relay.damus.io/" ], [ "p", "1338f770151a6878961d9a31711efe183599054a15d933c27876239e80a7f01b", "wss://nostr.wine/" ], [ "p", "fd5f837b783e06a883bb268d791aa89a0aedf302929a7c8d6c714ee7f7b629a2", "wss://search.nos.today/" ], [ "p", "1338f770151a6878961d9a31711efe183599054a15d933c27876239e80a7f01b", "wss://nostr.wine/" ], [ "p", "fd5f837b783e06a883bb268d791aa89a0aedf302929a7c8d6c714ee7f7b629a2", "wss://search.nos.today/" ] ], "content": "Can they qualify anti science? Because \"trust the people who say what science is to conduct science properly\" is antithetical to the scientific method. The scientific method should be used to validate all research. To examine and criticize existing work and conclusions, learn how one can validate it, or at least move the validation to someone who is trustworthy to the individuals directly impacted by research \u0026 medicine. nostr:nprofile1qqspxw8hwq2356rcjcwe5vt3rmlpsdveq49ptkfncfu8vgu7sznlqxcpz9mhxue69uhkummnw3ezuamfdejj7hvzeku nostr:nprofile1qqs06hur0durup4gswajdrter25f5zhd7vpf9xnu34k8znh877mzngspzamhxue69uhhxetpwf3kstnwdaejuar0v3shjtccw5l99 ", "sig": "f38e3aa4e0ab46d868a1ea4ec62a67065746e27a9a2d0315da5ea0136eb2d6fae0d4fda8e98beb21625e277a73a09ee6efb8c937705389cf0a1b16260a5ca1fc" }

liminal 🦠 on Nostr: Can they qualify anti science? Because "trust the people who say what science is to ...