quotingTo Bitcoiners responding to my opsec post with "If you're in public you must accept that someone will post pictures of you online without your consent".
nevent1q…e8m3
No I don't have to accept that. Nobody has to. You don't have to either. If you post pictures of people without their consent, it doesn't matter if it's a public or a private event, or if it's legal in your jurisdiction or not. It all doesn't matter.
If you don't care about it, it simply means that you don't care about the privacy of others. It means you don't care about the other's right to decide whether Apple, Google, Meta, or X should be fed with their faces. It means that you're feeding surveillance systems with locations, biometric data, and the identities of Bitcoiners around you.
Nobody cares about what's legal. This is a moral question. A question of your own principles in a world of all-encompassing digital surveillance.
Reject surveillance, respect privacy, remember your cypherpunk manners.
Karnage on Nostr: Agree. I try to not even record people's faces outside of bitcoin-related activities ...
Agree. I try to not even record people's faces outside of bitcoin-related activities even if I'm the only one who is going to see that photo / video later. It's just respect for privacy plain and simple.