Zsubmariner on Nostr: 110 is not "censorship". It's not an algo or moderators. It's sensible fucking data ...

110 is not "censorship". It's not an algo or moderators. It's sensible fucking data limits. Ones that money fits through and spam doesn't. Got it?

quoting
nevent1q…4hpq

You don’t censor spam, you rate limit it. Censorship requires content moderation by a centralised entity. There is no such entity in Bitcoin besides core devs. The rest are nodes that don’t do content moderation. They enforce rate limits, and they always have. Honestly it’s tiresome reading about the censorship narrative. Core propagandist just throw away some words like censorship, permissionless, free markets (all good stuff) but without the nuance around them and plebs eat them up and start repeating them ad infinitum. It’s so stupid.