Is this yet more reflexive deference to the latter day nobility vs. an uppity peasant; or is there something about this guy's expertise and experience that he totally fails to get across on linkedin?
It's obviously not ethically better when it's one of those 'the boys with the golden numbers are untouchable' cases; but this just seems like a wildly outsized amount of impunity to try to provide for a seemingly stock-grade c-level.