of course maintaining looks different than declining. but there exists a number lower than "booming" that is still increasing. that isn't happening, but to suggests that having fewer kids than a generation in which births "BOOMED" is inherently insufficient is either stupid or dishonest.
does everything being the boomers' fault get you anything you want? except an excuse?
HonkHonkBoom (npub1xr0…0fwx) Myshkin (npub1fzc…zeh2) ThePoastmasterGeneral (npub1px3…gsgw)