Join Nostr
2026-01-31 21:52:47 UTC
in reply to

Lea Verou, PhD on Nostr: [2/3] But nearly every argument against LLM-assisted programming has appeared before. ...

[2/3]

But nearly every argument against LLM-assisted programming has appeared before.

Assembly programmers in the 50s said the same things about 3GLs:
“Real programmers write assembly” they’d cry.
High-level languages were “inefficient, buggy, and produced slower, bloated code” compared to hand-optimized assembly code.
“You can’t trust what you didn’t write!”

And they were not wrong — at first. Early compilers did produce worse code, and debugging machine-generated output was miserable.