Governmental Systems Explained
Monarchy: One person has all the power, but of course this is impossible so mainly their ministers and bureaucracy have the power. However, they make all the *big* decisions. They typically rule for life and inherit the position from a parent or other relative. Hope they're not crazy!
Aristocracy: A small number of people have a massive amount of power, usually inherited through a family line. How did they get so much power? Usually by being good at killing and/or stealing. They tend to make up stories painting themselves as inherently better than everyone else and thus destined to rule
Democracy: Power is shared by all of the people equally. They usually exercise this power by voting for things, so people who can convince them to vote for things are the ones with the *real* power. Civic officials may or may not be chosen by random lottery
Republic: The people hold elections to designate representatives who then hold power and make policy decisions on their behalf. This has the advantage of allowing the average citizen to not be too concerned about politics, and the disadvantage of allowing the average citizen to not be too concerned about politics
Dictatorship: Whoever can force others to do their bidding has the power. Kind of like monarchy, but less stable without a justifying myth like the Divine Right of Kings; if it's nakedly obvious that force is the only determinant of power, people start getting ideas real quick
Constitutional Monarchy: There's a monarch, but they have no power and nobody quite knows why they're still there. Tourism seems to be the major justification
Theocracy: Those who know the divine will are the ones with the power. How do they know the divine will? Part of it is written down in ancient books, part of it is creative interpretation of those ancient books, and part of it is "divinely inspired", ie. made up. How do we know they know the divine will? Usually because they wear an impressive hat
Xauri'EL Zwaan
npub1y2…8xs4j
2025-09-27 05:37:58 UTC
Author Public Key
npub1y2swxup7x6nedju2x09m72qnvdw4fznh2aweme3jpc5zvlekxl5qs8xs4jSeen on
wss://relay.momostr.pinkPublished at
2025-09-27 05:37:58 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "ad68d7411a268cda5b3aa4975c903e7c543552ee6a8d6e205d87326afe62d52d",
"pubkey": "22a0e3703e36a796cb8a33cbbf2813635d548a77575d9de6320e28267f3637e8",
"created_at": 1758951478,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.nz/@XauriEL/115274644126548489",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.nz/users/XauriEL/statuses/115274644126548489",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://mastodon.nz/users/XauriEL/statuses/115274644126548489",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Governmental Systems Explained\n\nMonarchy: One person has all the power, but of course this is impossible so mainly their ministers and bureaucracy have the power. However, they make all the *big* decisions. They typically rule for life and inherit the position from a parent or other relative. Hope they're not crazy!\n\nAristocracy: A small number of people have a massive amount of power, usually inherited through a family line. How did they get so much power? Usually by being good at killing and/or stealing. They tend to make up stories painting themselves as inherently better than everyone else and thus destined to rule\n\nDemocracy: Power is shared by all of the people equally. They usually exercise this power by voting for things, so people who can convince them to vote for things are the ones with the *real* power. Civic officials may or may not be chosen by random lottery\n\nRepublic: The people hold elections to designate representatives who then hold power and make policy decisions on their behalf. This has the advantage of allowing the average citizen to not be too concerned about politics, and the disadvantage of allowing the average citizen to not be too concerned about politics\n\nDictatorship: Whoever can force others to do their bidding has the power. Kind of like monarchy, but less stable without a justifying myth like the Divine Right of Kings; if it's nakedly obvious that force is the only determinant of power, people start getting ideas real quick\n\nConstitutional Monarchy: There's a monarch, but they have no power and nobody quite knows why they're still there. Tourism seems to be the major justification\n\nTheocracy: Those who know the divine will are the ones with the power. How do they know the divine will? Part of it is written down in ancient books, part of it is creative interpretation of those ancient books, and part of it is \"divinely inspired\", ie. made up. How do we know they know the divine will? Usually because they wear an impressive hat",
"sig": "d65706ceff925617623c361b561e47bf4da9ed781acd44fcacc3adbf6ec656aa6b817138fc8d69366f6e6ca4001896f30d623b9af7dca9c0e794e6bb78c4dbca"
}