I think you're pretty fundamentally missing my point, but also - even charitably, I think this is a really silly answer.
"Casual usage of this thing is fueling an economically unsustainable and environmentally harmful gold rush - a gold rush that would not be happening if there wasn't casual demand for the product."
"If OpenAI didn't cause the gold rush, somepony else would have."
Like.. this does not mean that encouraging the gold rush is suddenly environmentally OK.