LeoWandersleb on Nostr: We should make Nostr the best place to rally around causes. Badges (NIP-58) never ...
We should make Nostr the best place to rally around causes.
Badges (NIP-58) never found PMF for political/technical signaling. Emoji flags in display names are cute but shallow. We can do much better with primitives that already exist.
1. NIP-32 labels as the machine-readable stance
kind 1985 with ["L","causes"] ["l","bip110/oppose","causes"]
→ queryable, aggregatable, namespaced
2. NIP-23 article as the "why"
Long-form reasoning the label points to via "a" tag
→ substance, not just vibes
3. Zaps as weight
Sats-backed support filters noise and raises signal quality
4. Web-of-trust as the lens
"How does MY network feel about X?" — computable client-side
→ sybil-resistant by default, no global moderation needed
What's missing is UI, not protocol. Imagine a "Causes" tab:
- Trending topics by WoT activity
- Tally of support/oppose, weighted by zaps + trust distance
- One tap to publish your stance + reasoning
- See which npubs you trust stand where
Optional: a replaceable kind (e.g. 30178) with d-tag = topic, for "current stance" semantics. One canonical position per user per topic, updatable over time.
Published at
2026-04-23 12:29:34 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "aafe9015c85dfd9d8fd5b87ea4ccb26e61b0636b232e12d7762264f20dad295e",
"pubkey": "46fcbe3065eaf1ae7811465924e48923363ff3f526bd6f73d7c184b16bd8ce4d",
"created_at": 1776947374,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"alt",
"A short note: We should make Nostr the best place to rally aroun..."
]
],
"content": "We should make Nostr the best place to rally around causes.\n\nBadges (NIP-58) never found PMF for political/technical signaling. Emoji flags in display names are cute but shallow. We can do much better with primitives that already exist.\n\n1. NIP-32 labels as the machine-readable stance\n kind 1985 with [\"L\",\"causes\"] [\"l\",\"bip110/oppose\",\"causes\"]\n → queryable, aggregatable, namespaced\n\n2. NIP-23 article as the \"why\"\n Long-form reasoning the label points to via \"a\" tag\n → substance, not just vibes\n\n3. Zaps as weight\n Sats-backed support filters noise and raises signal quality\n\n4. Web-of-trust as the lens\n \"How does MY network feel about X?\" — computable client-side\n → sybil-resistant by default, no global moderation needed\n\nWhat's missing is UI, not protocol. Imagine a \"Causes\" tab:\n- Trending topics by WoT activity\n- Tally of support/oppose, weighted by zaps + trust distance\n- One tap to publish your stance + reasoning\n- See which npubs you trust stand where\n\nOptional: a replaceable kind (e.g. 30178) with d-tag = topic, for \"current stance\" semantics. One canonical position per user per topic, updatable over time.",
"sig": "8f8008d8fc06fa21582b44a91700cb34695b34f1211468f18a6725cec1ec44e9440ea664e9595d265c2e71ec0f280e8894200b9afb79acb415077fd1260e0d77"
}