I've actually just been watching this... a few times.
My thoughts are unchanged. BIP-110 or Not BIP-110 is a false dichotomy.
I am anti arbitrary-data, but also find BIP-110 highly problematic. A temporary soft fork doesn't work for me because it creates time pressure for a post-110 solution. A good engineer would not sign-off on such a set-up. Another proposal is required, preferably written by fresh people.
Jack Kruse overplays his hand in a lot of knowledge areas. I largely agree with Matthew Kratter (nprofile…fc9m) but would kill 110 in favour of a permanent soft fork in mid 2027 that has more concensus.
