quixote on Nostr: Mastodon netiquette question: I thought you were supposed to include all "@" ...
Mastodon netiquette question: I thought you were supposed to include all "@" mentioned in a post to which you're replying. Sometimes that's a paragraph's worth (and on my instance they all seem to count toward the 500 char limit).
Recently I saw a comment that implied doing that was a cousin of an email "reply all" and you should only include the @ you're actually replying to.
Which is it? Polite or stupid?? 😬
@admin@mastodon.nz ?
Published at
2024-08-06 10:26:43 UTCEvent JSON
{
"id": "f6b7cd20fb185b7b79cea1d9f56960aed01af54d841f476a673d5292b3c0a4f4",
"pubkey": "473a2f07273f69c0f06dad6b74a8d0dae1bb0fbc3dff93603d389b28dd95e6fc",
"created_at": 1722940003,
"kind": 1,
"tags": [
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.nz/@quixote/112914596060424432",
"web"
],
[
"proxy",
"https://mastodon.nz/users/quixote/statuses/112914596060424432",
"activitypub"
],
[
"L",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"l",
"pink.momostr.activitypub:https://mastodon.nz/users/quixote/statuses/112914596060424432",
"pink.momostr"
],
[
"-"
]
],
"content": "Mastodon netiquette question: I thought you were supposed to include all \"@\" mentioned in a post to which you're replying. Sometimes that's a paragraph's worth (and on my instance they all seem to count toward the 500 char limit).\n\nRecently I saw a comment that implied doing that was a cousin of an email \"reply all\" and you should only include the @ you're actually replying to.\n\nWhich is it? Polite or stupid?? 😬 \n\n@admin@mastodon.nz ?",
"sig": "9982d968ace6f8cbb1900b2cb640082ad675e3e9ef0ff0fbd36bb33fa4e2ba3f90d1941be9923a8c71681f6b7a1f507f43931ea5aa23b9764814b9ac87c42e75"
}