<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>postr wrote</title><author_name>postr (npub18v…d8xj9)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub18v9ll5jdu96qmn33tpyqdwnjc0fz4adquevj8cav23vlcc4zfh8qpd8xj9</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>really feeling what you said here:  so “quantum” is largely a marketing label.&#xA;&#xA;one can guess that you must obviously know yourself that you are babbling (no grammar, being vague with saying “it” a lot) and have not at all added any clarity to it (the bitcoin lens framework).&#xA;&#xA;one of their main claims is that superposition is not possible, because of a certain type of quantum description of base layer physics…if at a quantum level of physics everything is discrete in nature, superposition is impossible and so too is the quantum computers that rely on quantum descriptions of particles. &#xA;&#xA;so lots of confusion happens when quantum computers are being rejected as unreal or unrealizable…but then still using quantum computing as an analogy to describe bitcoin.&#xA;&#xA;</html></oembed>