<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>f0xr wrote</title><author_name>f0xr (npub1h3…uwlmn)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub1h3kv6yar972dxetymty0t936p45utq7fj6p5rw7ly79jrafsnrjqvuwlmn</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>FREE ⚡SAT⚡ GIVEAWAY, PLEASE SHARE! &#xA;&#xA;I recently started a Substack newsletter and I&#39;ve been brainstorming ways to bootstrap my subscriber list. I don&#39;t use social media outside of Nostr, and I&#39;d like to keep it that way.&#xA;&#xA;I have a theory that Nostr+zaps could open up a different type of &#34;advertising&#34; model. Typically with paid ads, you&#39;re paying the centralized social media company to show your content to a bunch of people in hopes that they&#39;ll view it. Why not pay the viewers directly and cut out the middleman? That way they&#39;re getting some value regardless whether they like your product or not, and it&#39;s just a more elegant system overall. &#xA;&#xA;So I&#39;m going to run an experiment myself and see how this works. I recently wrote an article about Bitcoin and money inspired by a comment @Odell made on a recent Citadel Dispatch episode. If you&#39;re interested in the philosophy of money and banking, you might enjoy it. &#xA;&#xA;I&#39;m going to link the article below. It&#39;s about a 20 minute read. So the first 10 people who read the article and leave a thoughtful response, commentary, or criticism as a reply to this note will get zapped 15,000 sats each. I think that&#39;s fair for 20 minutes of your time. After the first ten replies, I&#39;ll zap each additional reader 1,500 sats as long as my funds hold out. &#xA;&#xA;And if you find the content valuable enough that you feel you don&#39;t need the sats, just zap it back to me and I&#39;ll pass it along to the next person. &#xA;&#xA;Thanks in advance! &#xA;&#xA;&#xA;https://open.substack.com/pub/f0xr/p/money-as-equity?r=3i492j&amp;utm_campaign=post&amp;utm_medium=web</html></oembed>