<oembed><type>rich</type><version>1.0</version><title>Eurico Vianna wrote</title><author_name>Eurico Vianna (npub145…uwccq)</author_name><author_url>https://yabu.me/npub14570nka9pzkq6n8rnra4uxdky07p0wggh3j0sqs5l2jvnnjnlgmsguwccq</author_url><provider_name>njump</provider_name><provider_url>https://yabu.me</provider_url><html>Although farmers (ecological or industrial) are being vilified, I believe they have a better grasp of real risks and economy than most people. We are still analysing BCH&#39;s value against the dollar (or whatever national FIAT currency) whereas farmers analyse &#39;value&#39; against their capacity to produce goods (mostly food) that they can sell or barter. For instance, currently a heifer (a young cow) is being sold for aprox 1,200 dollars (it&#39;s the highest it has been in decades) or 2.5 BCH  and within aprox 2 years this cow will produce another one (50% return on investment per year). Farmers are the most secure people in a hyper inflation situation, exactly because what they produce holds its value in a crisis. They will judge adoption accordingly... We need to show them that even if  BCH brings a level of risk (volatility), the benefits of a P2P and finite currency are worth it.</html></oembed>